Samson v. California, No. 04-9728.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation162 L. Ed. 2d 933,126 S. Ct. 34,545 U.S. 1165
Docket NumberNo. 04-9728.
PartiesSAMSON <I>v.</I> CALIFORNIA.
Decision Date27 September 2005
545 U.S. 1165
126 S. Ct. 34
162 L. Ed. 2d 933
SAMSON
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 04-9728.
Supreme Court of United States.
September 27, 2005.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Marshall v. Marshall, No. 04-1544.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 1 Mayo 2006
    .... binding on the United States [D]istrict [C]ourt." Ibid. (citing Durfee v. Duke, 375 U. S. 106, 115-116 (1963)). We granted certiorari, 545 U. S. 1165 (2005), to resolve the apparent confusion among federal courts concerning the scope of the probate exception. Satisfied that the instant ca......
  • Samson v. California, No. 04-9728.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 19 Junio 2006
    ...not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing. No. A102394 (Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., Oct. 14, 2004), App. 12-14. We granted certiorari, 545 U. S. 1165 (2005), to answer a variation of the question this Court left open in United States v. Knights, 534 U. S. 112, 120, n. 6 (2001)—whether a co......
  • People v. Williams, A116980 (Cal. App. 4/23/2008), A116980
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 23 Abril 2008
    ...14, 2004, A102394) [nonpub. opn.], rev. denied (Jan. 12, 2005, S129509), cert. granted Sept. 27, 2005 sub nom. Samson v. California, 545 U.S. 1165.) After the trial court denied Williams' section 995 motion, he filed a petition for a writ of prohibition in this court, which we denied. (Will......
5 cases
  • Motley v. Parks, No. 02-56648.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • 30 Diciembre 2005
    ...Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Samson v. California on the precise issue involved in this case. See ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 34, 162 L.Ed.2d 933 (2005).4 Thus, the very justification for Saucier's first step is inapplicable; avoiding the constitutional question will not impede the e......
  • Marshall v. Marshall, No. 04-1544.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 1 Mayo 2006
    .... binding on the United States [D]istrict [C]ourt." Ibid. (citing Durfee v. Duke, 375 U. S. 106, 115-116 (1963)). We granted certiorari, 545 U. S. 1165 (2005), to resolve the apparent confusion among federal courts concerning the scope of the probate exception. Satisfied that the instant ca......
  • Samson v. California, No. 04-9728.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 19 Junio 2006
    ...not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing. No. A102394 (Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., Oct. 14, 2004), App. 12-14. We granted certiorari, 545 U. S. 1165 (2005), to answer a variation of the question this Court left open in United States v. Knights, 534 U. S. 112, 120, n. 6 (2001)—whether a co......
  • People v. Williams, A116980 (Cal. App. 4/23/2008), A116980
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 23 Abril 2008
    ...14, 2004, A102394) [nonpub. opn.], rev. denied (Jan. 12, 2005, S129509), cert. granted Sept. 27, 2005 sub nom. Samson v. California, 545 U.S. 1165.) After the trial court denied Williams' section 995 motion, he filed a petition for a writ of prohibition in this court, which we denied. (Will......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT