Samuel Bergman v. Peter Gay
| Decision Date | 19 November 1906 |
| Citation | 64 A. 1106,79 Vt. 262 |
| Parties | SAMUEL BERGMAN v. PETER GAY |
| Court | Vermont Supreme Court |
October Term, 1906.
REPLEVIN for a cart. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the March Term, 1906, Chittenden County, Miles, J presiding. Judgment for the defendant for the return of the property, one cent damages, and his costs. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.
Judgment affirmed.
C C. Briggs and H. S. Peck for the plaintiff.
A. V. Spaulding and Cowles & Moulton for the defendant.
Present: ROWELL, C. J., TYLER, MUNSON, WATSON, HASELTON, and POWERS, JJ.
The suit is replevin for a lunch-cart, which plaintiff owned subject to an overdue mortgage, and which defendant repaired for plaintiff and retained in his possession to enforce a lien for his services. Defendant finally sued plaintiff on his claim and had the cart attached by copy filed in the clerk's office; and on the same day, before the hour when the copy was filed, plaintiff took the cart from defendant's possession by virtue of this replevin writ. While both suits were pending in county court, the mortgagee took the cart from plaintiff's possession and had it sold on his mortgage. Defendant afterwards obtained judgment in his suit, and took out an execution, which was returned unsatisfied. At a subsequent term defendant had judgment in this suit for a return of the property and for one cent damages and his cost.
V. S. 2279 provides that one who makes, alters or repairs an article of personal property at the request of the owner shall have a lien thereon for his charges, and may retain possession of the property until his charges are paid. § § 2280-2281 provide for a sale of the property by the creditor in satisfaction of his charges, if the value of the property affected does not exceed one hundred dollars. These provisions were first enacted in 1888. V. S. 2299, first enacted in 1867, provides that one holding personal property by a lien implied by law may have it attached and sold on execution in payment of the debt, and that such attachment shall not be a waiver of the lien. Plaintiff claims that a mechanic's lien on personal property is a right expressly given by statute and not one implied by law, and that defendant has lost his lien by attaching the cart.
A lien arises at common law in favor of one who improves by his labor or expense the chattel of another at the owner's request. Note 16 Eng. Rul. Cas. 94. This right was fully recognized by our decisions before it was established by the statute. Burdict v Murray, 3 Vt. 302; Ruggles v. Walker, 34 Vt. 468. V. S. 2279 is merely declaratory of the common law; and the enactment of this, and the accompanying sections prescribing...
To continue reading
Request your trial