Samuel Veazie and Levi Young, Plaintiffs In Error v. Wyman Moor
Decision Date | 01 December 1852 |
Citation | 14 How. 568,55 U.S. 568,14 L.Ed. 545 |
Parties | SAMUEL VEAZIE AND LEVI YOUNG, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WYMAN B. S. MOOR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial45 cases
-
U.S. v. Myers
...1, 15-16, 9 S.Ct. 6, 32 L.Ed. 346 (1888); The Daniel Ball, 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 557, 563, 19 L.Ed. 999 (1870); Veazie v. Moor, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 568, 573, 14 L.Ed. 545 (1852); Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) at 189. Faithful application of Scarborough to every criminal statute where a pe......
-
Carter v. Carter Coal Co Helvering v. Carter Tway Coal Co v. Glenn Tway Coal Co v. Clark
...of messages by telegraph,—indeed, every species on commercial intercourse among the several states.' In Veazie et al. v. Moor, 14 How. 568, 573, 574, 14 L.Ed. 545, this court, after saying that the phrase could never be applied to transactions wholly internal, significantly added: 'Nor can ......
-
Wickard v. Filburn
...is the relation between the activity or condition and the effect?' See also, cases cited infra, notes 17 and 21. 17 Veazie v. Moor, 14 How. 568, 573, 574, 14 L.Ed. 545; Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U.S. 1, 20-22, 9 S.Ct. 6, 9, 10, 32 L.Ed. 346. 18 24 Stat. 379, 49 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., 49 U.S.C.A. §......
-
U.S. v. Lopez
...with the Commerce Clause as a limit on state legislation that discriminated against interstate commerce. See, e.g., Veazie v. Moor, 14 How. 568, 573-575, 14 L.Ed. 545 (1853) (upholding a state-created steamboat monopoly because it involved regulation of wholly internal commerce); Kidd v. Pe......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...93, 99 S.Ct. 939, 59 L.Ed.2d 171 (1979), 1184 Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252, 100 S.Ct. 540, 62 L.Ed.2d 461 (1980), 1070 Veazie v. Moor, 55 U.S. 568, 14 L.Ed. 545 (1852), Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 120 S.Ct. 1858, 146 L.Ed.2d 836 (20......
-
More on the Origins of the Fuller Court's Jurisprudence: Reexamining the Scope of Federal Power Over Commerce and Manufacturing in Nineteenth-Century Constitutional Law
...exhibited an extraordinary amount of consis-tency with respect to the nature and scope of the federal commerce power. In Veazie v Young, 55 U.S. 568 (1852) the Court rejected the claim that the merce clause prohibited the states from improving a purely intrastate water- way by establishing ......
-
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APPELLATE COURT RESTRICTS CONGRESS' COMMERCE CLAUSE POWERS OVER ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ON FOREIGN WATERS - UNITED STATES V. DAVILA-MENDOZA.
...Clause can be used and, specifically, which activities are eligible for regulation, remains rather unclear. Id. See also Veazie v. Moor, 55 U.S. 568, 573-74 (1853) (explaining role of Commerce Clause). The intent of the Commerce Clause is to "establish a perfect equality amongst the several......