Sanchez v. Public Service Co.

Decision Date08 November 1971
Docket NumberNo. 9294,9294
Citation1971 NMSC 105,490 P.2d 962,83 N.M. 245
PartiesServando S. SANCHEZ and Pedro Jaquis, Petitioners, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY of New Mexico, Respondent.
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
OPINION

STEPHENSON, Justice.

Respondent (defendant) was granted summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Sanchez v. Public Service Company of New Mexico, 82 N.M. 752, 487 P.2d 180 (Ct.App. decided June 18, 1971). We reverse. A statement of facts, issues and procedures had appears in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

Summary judgment may properly be granted only if the moving party is entitled to it as a matter of law upon clear and undisputed facts. Coe v. City of Albuquerque, 81 N.M. 361, 467 P.2d 27 (1970). The evidence must be viewed in its most favorable aspect in support of a trial on the issues. Johnson v. J. S. & H. Construction Co., 81 N.M. 42, 462 P.2d 627 (Ct.App.1969). All reasonable inferences will be drawn in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought. Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. Stryker, 81 N.M. 227, 465 P.2d 284 (1970). The burden rests upon the movant to show there is no genuine issue of material fact. Cessna Finance Corp. v. Mesilla Valley Flying Serv., 81 N.M. 10, 462 P.2d 144 (1969).

There is a factual conflict here. Petitioners (plaintiffs) assert that the height of the power line was 13 to 18 feet, based upon the estimate stated in the Lovato affidavit. Defendant's position is that the line was 28 feet 11 inches high, based upon a measurement two days after the injury, coupled with a statement in the Roundtree affidavit to the general effect that the line was in the same position at the time of the measurement as it was at the time of the injury.

We are not concerned with which version weighs most heavily, but with whether there is an issue of a material fact. The height of the line being a material fact, we have no hesitancy in holding that such an issue existed.

The Court of Appeals held plaintiffs' factual position 'inherently improbable' based upon an application of the 'physical facts' rule. See Ortega v. Koury, 55 N.M. 142, 227 P.2d 941 (1951) where we said:

'Physical facts and conditions may point so unerringly to the truth as to leave no room for a contrary conclusion based on reason or common sense, and under such circumstances the physical facts are not affected by sworn testimony which in mere words conflicts with them. * * *'

See also Massey v. Beacon Supply Company, 70 N.M. 149, 371 P.2d 798 (1962) and Bolen v. Rio Rancho Estates, Inc., 81 N.M. 307, 466 P.2d 873 (Ct.App.1970) where it was held:

'The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Wilson v. Wylie
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • December 19, 1973
    ...v. Koury, 55 N.M. 142, 227 P.2d 941 (1951); Sanchez v. Public Service Company, 82 N.M. 752, 487 P.2d 180 (Ct.App.1971), rev'd 83 N.M. 245, 490 P.2d 962 (1971); Bolen v. Rio Rancho Estates, Inc., 81 N.M. 307, 466 P.2d 873 (Ct.App.1970). These cases, as cited by defendants, involve situations......
  • Goodman v. Brock
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • June 16, 1972
    ...were entitled as a matter of law for some other reason to a summary judgment in their favor. Rule 56(c), supra; Sanchez v. Public Service Co., 83 N.M. 245, 490 P.2d 962 (1971); Montoya v. City of Albuquerque, 82 N.M. 90, 476 P.2d 60 (1970); Cessna Finance Corp. v. Mesilla Valley Flying Serv......
  • Salas v. Mountain States Mut. Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • February 4, 2009
    ... ... policy[,]" noting that "[t]his asserted duty has no basis in tort, contract, or public policy." Id. ¶ 50 (Vigil, J., dissenting). Instead, the dissenting opinion concluded that "[t]he ... ...
  • Willey v. United Mercantile Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • July 12, 1999
    ... ... , that the three-year limitations period in the Policy is invalid because it is contrary to public policy, and that the applicable limitations period is therefore the six-year period for ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT