Sanders v. Fox
Decision Date | 03 April 1957 |
Docket Number | C90-56,No. C89-56,C91-56.,C89-56 |
Parties | Robert V. SANDERS and Nancy Ritter Sanders, Plaintiffs, v. Charles I. FOX, Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant. Kimball J. CRANNEY and Janice J. Cranney, Plaintiffs, v. Charles I. FOX, Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant. N. V. SANDERS and Clover J. Sanders, Plaintiffs, v. Charles I. FOX, Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Utah |
Thornley K. Swan and C. Preston Allen, of Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiffs.
A. Pratt Kesler, U. S. Atty., Salt Lake City, Utah, and James P. Garland and David R. Frazer, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant.
The above cases were consolidated for trial for the reason that the issues of fact and law are common in each case.
Through these actions plaintiffs seek to recover income taxes paid for the years 1949, 1950 and 1951 in the combined amount of $8,750.20, together with interest thereon.
For convenience I will refer to the plaintiffs as "taxpayers", the defendant as "Director" and the Clover Club Foods Company, a Utah corporation, as "Corporation".
The sole question for determination is whether premiums paid by Corporation on insurance taken out on the lives of its four stockholders are equivalent to distributions of corporate dividends and taxable to the individual stockholders within the meaning of Section 115, Internal Revenue Code of 1939. It is appropriate at the outset to quote the applicable provisions of the Revenue Code (26 U.S.C., 1952 Ed., Section 115):
The facts are stipulated and are not in dispute. They may be summarized as follows:
During the taxable years in question the taxpayers were the sole stockholders in the Corporation; N. V. Sanders was President of the Corporation and his wife, Clover J. Sanders, was Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer; Kimball J. Cranney was Salesmanager of the Corporation and Robert V. Sanders was employed part time as a general worker. In 1949 N. V. Sanders and his wife, Clover J. Sanders, each owned 43% of the stock of the corporation; Kimball J. Cranney and Robert V. Sanders each owned 7%; in 1950 N. V. Sanders and Clover J. Sanders each owned 40% of the stock and Kimball J. Cranney and Robert V. Sanders each owned 10%; in 1951 N. V. Sanders and Clover J. Sanders each owned 37% of the stock and Kimball J. Cranney and Robert V. Sanders each owned 13%.
On March 23, 1949, the Taxpayers entered into a Stock Purchasing Agreement with the Corporation. This agreement provided that insurance was to be taken out on the lives of the stockholders according to a schedule attached to the agreement. The agreement provided the Corporation would pay the premiums and be designated the owner of the policies during the lifetime of the insured. The insured stockholder was to designate the beneficiary. I quote two paragraphs of the Agreement:
I construe the provisions of the agreement to mean that the beneficiary not only gets the fair market value of the stock as determined by the stockholders, but he also gets a pro rata percentage of the cash surrender value of all the insurance policies as of the day prior to decedent's death. It will be noted that if the stock should become of little value, the beneficiary would still receive the full proceeds taken out on the life of the decedent.
The Agreement provided that upon the death of the insured stockholder the beneficiary would receive the insurance proceeds on the condition that the beneficiary would sell the stock of the decedent to the Corporation at an adjusted price determined by the stockholders. The Agreement also provided that upon the death of a stockholder the adjusted price to be paid for his stock would be the greater of the following: (1) the value of the stock (as set out in the Agreement) plus a percentage of the cash surrender value, as of the day prior to his death, of all insurance policies (including those on his life) equal to the percentage of the shares of stock which were then owned by him; or (2) the amount of the proceeds payable under the terms of the policies on decedent's life.
The Agreement provided for the purchase by the Corporation out of the earnings and surplus any additional shares held by a decedent over and above the amount that could be purchased from the insurance proceeds. In the event the Corporation is unable to make such purchase out of the earnings and surplus, then the other stockholders may exercise all of the rights of the Corporation and purchase...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sanders v. Fox
...claim to refund upon taxes so assessed and paid for the years 1949, 1950 and 1951. The controversy arises from stipulated facts. See 149 F.Supp. 942. Clover Club Foods Company, a Utah corporation manufacturing potato chips, at all pertinent times had four stockholders, present appellants: N......
- United States v. Jackson