Sanders v. State, 4 Div. 551
Decision Date | 15 November 1977 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 551 |
Parties | Willie J. SANDERS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Gary R. Maxwell, Dothan, for appellant.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Milton E. Belcher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.
Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder and sentenced to a term of twelve years in the penitentiary. At arraignment, in the presence of his counsel, appellant pleaded not guilty.
The victim of the assault was appellant's sixteen-month old daughter, Stephanie Sanders.
Ms. Marie Rabon, a registered nurse at the Southeast Alabama Medical Center in Dothan, Alabama testified that on November 27, 1976 around six o'clock p. m. appellant brought his daughter to the emergency room for treatment. Ms. Rabon stated that the child had multiple bruises, lacerations and welts all over her body. She asked appellant where the child got these injuries and he stated, "I don't know." The nurse further examined the child and discovered that she had wounds on her abdomen, her pelvic area, her buttocks, the small of her back and down both legs. Her legs were swollen, red and hot to the touch. She asked the appellant to tell her again what happened. Appellant said he was asleep and was awakened by a child crying; that he went into the child's room and found that she had fallen out of the bed. He stated that he started spanking her for being bad and waking him up, and the child fainted and then he carried her to the emergency room of the hospital.
Ms. Rabon further testified that the child's body was almost totally covered The nurse called Dr. Lies, a pediatrician, who came to the hospital, examined the child and admitted her to the hospital with a concussion, "and probable battered child syndrome." The police were called to the hospital by the nurse with the concurrence of the doctor as they were under an obligation to report every child abuse case. She said the child remained in the hospital for three days. She further described the child as very listless and not acting normally. She stated that she found old and fresh bruises on the child. She described the older bruises as purple and the fresh ones as pink.
Ms. Rabon was recalled by the State and testified that "this was a rare case to see such outstanding marks on a child that young."
At the time of appellant's trial Dr. Lies was out of the state and the State and appellant's counsel entered into the following stipulation:
"It is stipulated by and between the State and the defendant, and the defendant's attorney, that if Dr. William Lies were present and testifying under oath on the witness stand, that he would testify that he attended this child in the emergency room; and that he admitted the child to the hospital, because of a concussion, and probable battered child syndrome, and he admitted her for three days for observation."
Police Officer Robert Hawlette testified that he went to the Southeast Alabama Medical Center emergency room on the evening of November 27, 1976, and in the presence of Ms. Rabon and Dr. Lies he made photographs of the nude child. These photographs were introduced into evidence without objections.
Officer Hawlette further stated that he observed the injuries on the child's body and testified, He said the injuries in the stomach area appeared to have been inflicted with something sharp. He further stated that she had a bruise on the jaw but he could not tell if the bruise on the forehead was new or old. Hawlette saw appellant in the examining room and appellant admitted beating the child and did not appear to be worried at all about the child. He called James R. McCord, the Juvenile Officer, to come to the hospital to assist him.
James R. McCord was an officer in the Juvenile Division. He went to the emergency room and saw the victim of the assault and observed the injuries on the child's body as described by the nurse on duty when the child was brought to the hospital. McCord arrested appellant and charged him with "child abuse." He gave appellant the Miranda rights and warnings, and appellant said he understood his rights. Appellant was transported to the station house by McCord and Police Officer Jack Adkins. On the way to the Police Department, appellant told the officers that he was watching a wrestling match on television and the baby kept falling down. He said he got a little ill at that time and put the baby in her bed. He returned to look at television and when the wrestling match was over he went to sleep, and the baby fell off the bed and "woke" him up, and he took his belt off and whipped the baby.
McCord further testified that when they got to the Police Department appellant signed a waiver of rights form and made a statement in the form of questions and answers which was reduced to writing.
From the record:
Police Officer Jack Adkins testified that he was in charge of the Juvenile Division of the Police Department and investigated the charge against appellant on November 27, 1976. He stated that he had occasion to see the victim in the emergency room of the hospital. He described the child's injuries as follows: "It was bruised all on the front of it, down between its legs, around its vagina, and all on the sides, and had some marks about the face."
He further stated that appellant told him that the kid fell off the bed and awakened him and he got mad and whipped the child with a belt.
The medical records from the hospital concerning the victim were admitted into evidence without objections.
It developed that a preliminary hearing was set for appellant on the charge of child abuse. At this hearing appellant's counsel made known to the Magistrate that the child abuse statute had been declared unconstitutional. (See State v. Ballard, Ala.Crim.App., 341 So.2d 957). It was then that a warrant was issued charging appellant with assault with intent to murder.
Appellant presented evidence...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McArdle v. State
...with an intent to take life, under circumstances which if successful would constitute murder in either degree. Horn supra; Sanders v. State, 354 So.2d 44 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 48 (Ala.1977); Bowen v. State, 32 Ala.App. 357, 26 So.2d 205 "When the proof shows that an act was......
-
Brown v. State of Ala.
...assault with intent to murder is the intent to take life, which is not an element of robbery. Brown v. State, 367 So.2d at 559; Sanders v. State, 354 So.2d 44 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 48 (Ala.1977). An essential element of the crime of robbery is the taking and carrying away......
-
Linson v. State
...to take life under circumstances which, if successful, would constitute murder. Horn v. State, 98 Ala. 23, 13 So. 329; Sanders v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 354 So.2d 44. Although intent may be inferred from the character of the assault, the use of a deadly weapon, and attending circumstances, the......
-
Brown v. State, 6 Div. 769
...An essential element of assault with intent to murder, which is not an element of robbery, is an intent to take life. Sanders v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 354 So.2d 44, cert. denied, Ala., 354 So.2d 48 It is therefore apparent that the appellant committed two separate and distinct crimes which ar......