Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale
| Citation | 250 So.2d 341 |
| Decision Date | 20 July 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-281,71-281 |
| Parties | Ray SANDSTROM, Appellant, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.
Ray Sandstrom, of Sandstrom & Hodge, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Thomas P. Quinn, III, and Bryson K. Lovejoy, Sp. Asst. City Prosecutor, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Mr. Sandstrom was convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Fort Lauderdale of engaging in the occupation of attorney-at-law without first having obtained a municipal occupational license as required by ordinance. The conviction was affirmed on appeal to the circuit court, and a further appeal to the Supreme Court resulted in the cause being transferred to this court for disposition. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the same upon the authority of Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 755; Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Amos, 1932, 104 Fla. 609, 141 So. 153; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Brickell, 1914, 233 U.S. 304, 34 S.Ct. 493, 58 L.Ed. 974; Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 1910, 217 U.S. 114, 30 S.Ct. 496, 54 L.Ed. 688; Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville, 8 Cir.1931, 50 F.2d 670; Kaufman v. City of Tucson, 1967, 6 Ariz.App. 429, 433 P.2d 282; Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of Bakersfield, 36 Cal.2d 136, 222 P.2d 879, and 9 McQuillin, Law of Municipal Corporations, 3rd Edition, § 26.60.
Certiorari denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Tampa v. Addison
...Bar. See Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 133 So.2d 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961) (Sandstrom I); Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 250 So.2d 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (Sandstrom II). In response, the Appellees argue that the facts of Sandstrom I and Sandstrom II are distinguishable from the......
- Ridley v. State