Santiago v. City of New York

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationSantiago v. City of New York, 294 AD2d 483, 742 N.Y.S.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Decision Date20 May 2002
PartiesFRANKIE L. SANTIAGO, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the plaintiff conceded that his original notice of claim was served on the defendant City of New York four days late. Thus, the late service of the original notice of claim was a nullity since it was made without leave of the court (see Kokkinos v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 238 AD2d 550, 551; Carr v City of New York, 176 AD2d 779; Bourguignon v City of New York, 157 AD2d 644, 645). Furthermore, since the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was made more than one year and 90 days after the accrual date of the claim, the Supreme Court did not have the authority to grant the motion (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; § 50-i; Hibbert v Suffolk County Dept. of Probation, 267 AD2d 205; Matter of Turner v New York City Hous. Auth., 243 AD2d 636, 637).

The Supreme Court properly granted the City's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim (see Mills v County of Monroe, 59 NY2d 307, cert denied 464 US 1018; Warren v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 281 AD2d 413).

We decline to reach the plaintiff's contention, in contradiction to his concession below, that the original notice of claim was timely served, as that contention is raised for the first time on appeal (see Matter of ELRAC, Inc. v Edwards, 270 AD2d 414, 415; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Bieder, 212 AD2d...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Antoinette C. v. Cnty. of Erie
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 4, 2022
    ...of Polanco v. New York City Hous. Auth. , 39 A.D.3d 320, 321, 833 N.Y.S.2d 471 [1st Dept. 2007] ; Santiago v. City of New York , 294 A.D.2d 483, 484, 742 N.Y.S.2d 566 [2d Dept. 2002] ). In any event, we agree with the County that the accident report did not provide it with the requisite act......
  • Jennifer C. v. Shoreham-Wading River Cent. Sch. Dist., Index No.: 41038-10
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 27, 2011
    ...Service of a notice of claim beyond the ninety day statutory period without leave of the court is a nullity. Santiago v. City of New York, 294 A.D.2d 483, 742 N.Y.S.2d 566; Kokkinos v. Dormitory Auth. of the State of N.Y., 238 A.D.2d 550, 657 N.Y.S.2d81. General Municipal Law §50-i provides......
  • Nappi v. County of Suffolk
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2010
    ...service without leave of court was a nullity ( see Maxwell v. City of New York, 29 A.D.3d 540, 815 N.Y.S.2d 133; Santiago v. City of New York, 294 A.D.2d 483, 742 N.Y.S.2d 566; Henry v. Aguilar, 282 A.D.2d 711, 724 N.Y.S.2d 325). The plaintiffs were required to move within two years after t......
  • Antoinette C. v. Cnty. of Erie
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 4, 2022
    ... ... No. 949 CA 20-01388Supreme Court of New York, Fourth DepartmentFebruary 4, 2022 ... MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ... claimant is an infant'" (Matter of Mahan v Board ... of Educ. of Syracuse City School Dist., 269 A.D.2d 834, ... 834 [4th Dept 2000]; see generally Harris v City of New ... Auth., 39 A.D.3d 320, ... 321 [1st Dept 2007]; Santiago v City of New York, ... 294 A.D.2d 483, 484 [2d Dept 2002]) ... In any ... ...
  • Get Started for Free