Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction

Decision Date20 September 2005
Citation883 A.2d 1246,275 Conn. 930
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesJAIME SANTIAGO v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

The petitioner Jaime Santiago's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 420 (AC 25298), is denied.

Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Jessica Probolus, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Zachs v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 2021
    ...quotation marks omitted.) Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction , 90 Conn. App. 420, 425, 876 A.2d 1277, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 930, 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied sub nom. Santiago v. Lantz , 547 U.S. 1007, 126 S. Ct. 1472, 164 L. Ed. 2d 254 (2006). "Furthermore, [a]s a general rule,......
  • Ervin v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • February 11, 2020
    ...petitioner's defense"); see also Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction , 90 Conn. App. 420, 426, 876 A.2d 1277, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 930, 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied sub nom. Santiago v. Lantz , 547 U.S. 1007, 126 S. Ct. 1472, 164 L. Ed. 2d 254 (2006). Furthermore, "[t]here is no......
  • Stephen S. v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 17, 2012
    ...number of expert opinions'' before concluding that petitioner did not suffer from mental defect or disease), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 930, 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied sub nom. Santiago v. Lantz, 547 U.S. 1007, 126 S. Ct. 1472, 164 L. Ed. 2d 254 (2006). We cannot conclude thatMcQuillan......
  • Budziszewski v. Branch
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • August 11, 2020
    ...quotation marks omitted.) Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 420, 424-25, 876 A.2d 1277, cert. denied, 275 Conn. 930, 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied sub nom. Santiago v. Lantz, 547 U.S. 1007, 126 S. Ct. 1472, 164 L. Ed. 2d 254 (2006). "To satisfy the prejudice prong, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT