Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Sargeant v. Hall, No. 18-15205

Justia Case Summary Cited authorities 25 Cited in 17 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date02 March 2020
Docket NumberNo. 18-15205
Citation951 F.3d 1280
Parties Harry SARGEANT, III, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel HALL, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Moskowitz v. Am. Sav. Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 10, 2022
    ...it declined to decide the issue because the court decided costs could not be awarded at all in the case before it. Sargeant v. Hall , 951 F.3d 1280, 1282 n.1 (11th Cir. 2020).7 28 U.S.C. § 1920 provides:A judge or clerk of any court of the United States may tax as costs the following:(1) Fe......
  • Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. DeVine
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 28, 2021
    ...to the defendants who were voluntarily dismissed because they were prevailing parties under Rule 54(d)(1)); cf. Sargeant v. Hall , 951 F.3d 1280, 1287 n.4 (11th Cir. 2020) (discussing motion for costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d) ).We have also extended Cooter & Gell sl......
  • Royal Palm Props., LLC v. Pink Palm Props., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 7, 2022
    ...party in every case, or can there be no prevailing party? This is a pure legal question that we review de novo. See Sargeant v. Hall , 951 F.3d 1280, 1282 (11th Cir. 2020).III. THE PREVAILING PARTY STANDARDWhile the question of whether there can be no prevailing party is an issue of first i......
  • Vital Pharm., Inc. v. Monster Energy Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • August 3, 2021
    ...[o]bjection at [t]rial." FED. R. CIV. P. 15(b)(1). We start with the plain meaning of that textual requirement. See Sargeant v. Hall , 951 F.3d 1280, 1283 (11th Cir. 2020) ("We give the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure their plain meaning." (quoting Bus. Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Commc'ns E......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT