Sargent v. Smith

Decision Date12 November 2003
Citation266 Conn. 926,835 A.2d 476
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesTHOMAS C.C. SARGENT, TRUSTEE v. ANNE LENA SMITH.

Sabato P. Fiano, in support of the petition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 691 (AC 22997), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendant?

"2. If the answer to the first question is `yes,' did the Appellate Court properly direct judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $40,881.37, rather than remand the case for a new trial?"

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17093.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Sargent v. Smith
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • February 8, 2005
    ...properly direct judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $40,881.37, rather than remand the case for a new trial. Sargent v. Smith, 266 Conn. 926, 835 A.2d 476 (2003). We agree with the defendant that the Appellate Court improperly reversed the judgment of the trial court because the ref......
  • McIntosh v. Sullivan
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • November 12, 2003

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT