Sassoni v. Savoie

Decision Date27 May 1971
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 70-1782.
Citation327 F. Supp. 474
PartiesJohn SASSONI, Plaintiff, v. Leslie SAVOIE and Midcontinent Under writers Inc., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana

Darryl J. Carimi, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff.

Ronald A. Johnson, New Orleans, La., for defendants.

RUBIN, District Judge:

On February 13, 1970, John Sassoni injured his leg on the F/V LONER while employed on that vessel on the high seas.He sued both his employer and his employer's insurer.By motion for summary judgment, the insurer challenges the use of the Lousiana Direct Action Statute, LSA-R.S. 22:655, in this maritime suit.

This question has often been considered, though never directly decided by the courts of this circuit.In Guess v. Read, 5 Cir.1961, 290 F.2d 622, the court held the statute inapplicable to accidents on the high seas because it found that Louisiana courts did not apply the statute when the injury occurred outside of Louisiana; a premise that proved incorrect when considered by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Webb v. Zurich Insurance Co., 1968, 251 La. 558, 205 So.2d 398.Guess seemed further to hold that the direct action could not be utilized in maritime suits for death or injury on the high seas even if the Louisiana Courts construed the statute to have extra-territorial effect.SeeTaylor v. Fishing Tools, Inc., E.D.La.1967, 274 F.Supp. 666, 672.CompareContinental Oil Co. v. London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins. Ass'n, 5 Cir.1969, 417 F.2d 1030, 1037-1038.The Fifth Circuit has, however, recently indicated that this is still an open question.Olympic Towing Corp. v. Nebel Towing Co., 5 Cir.1969, 419 F.2d 230, 236.See alsoContinental Oil Co. v. London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins. Ass'n, supra, 417 F.2d at 1040.

It "does not offend the constitutional imperative for the uniformity of admiralty for the Louisiana Direct Action Statute to apply to maritime cases occurring on inland waters of Louisiana."Continental Oil Co. v. London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins. Ass'n, supra, 417 F.2d at 1037.Since the national uniformity of admiralty applies to navigation on inland waters as much as to maritime events in international waters, the Constitution would not forbid application of the Louisiana Direct Action Statute here.

It is now settled that Louisiana's Direct Action Statute applies to marine insurance policies.Olympic Towing Corp. v. Nebel Towing Co., supra, 419 F.2d at 236-237.In the Matter of Sincere Navigation Corporation, E.D.La.1971, 327 F. Supp. 1024.There remains only the question: "taking into account the National and International interests behind that element * * * for this maritime case is the Direct Action Statute" applicable?Continental Oil Co. v. London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins. Ass'n, supra, 417 F.2d at 1040.

The state clearly has an interest in permitting its injured citizens to sue the tortfeasor's insurer when the tortfeasor and the insurer both do business in the state.Losses are not then left uncompensated by a judgment-proof defendant.The duplication of actions required where injured persons must first execute against the tortfeasor and then the tortfeasor must seek indemnity from the assured is avoided.This regulation of insurance companies doing business in Louisiana has long been sanctioned by the courts.SeeCushing v. Maryland Cas. Co., 5 Cir.1952, 198 F.2d 536, 539, vac. on other grounds sub nom. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Cushing, 347 U.S. 409, 74 S. Ct. 608, 98 L.Ed. 806.

Nor does the federal interest in a uniform maritime law preclude approval of the direct action procedure in this case.There is no greater "lack of uniformity" in permitting a direct action for injuries on the high seas than there is for injuries in territorial waters.Nor is the vessel owner exposed by the Louisiana...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
5 cases
  • Moody v. Callon Petroleum Operating Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • February 11, 1999
    ...Direct Action statute had been applied and found not to be at odds with the need for uniformity in admiralty law. In Sassoni v. Savoie, 327 F.Supp. 474 (E.D.La.1971), the court permitted the application of the direct action statute to an injury arising beyond the territorial waters of the s......
  • Koesler v. Harvey Applicators, Inc., Civ. A. No. 75-2238.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • May 26, 1976
    ...the history of the American admiralty. The Thomas Jefferson, 1825, 23 U.S. (10 Wheat.) 428, 6 L.Ed. 358. Therefore, in Sassoni v. Savoie, E.D.La. 1971, 327 F.Supp. 474, this court permitted the application of the direct action statute to an injury arising beyond the territorial waters of th......
  • Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. BARGE W-701, Civ. A. No. 70-3491.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • April 18, 1979
    ...and that the insurer is now estopped from denying such delivery. In making this argument the parties rely on the case of Sassoni v. Savoie, 327 F.Supp. 474 (E.D.La.1971) which held that where a certificate of insurance was delivered in Louisiana then L.R.S. 22:655 provided a direct action a......
  • Vincent v. Penrod Drilling Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • June 20, 1979
    ...260 La. 29, 255 So.2d 63 (1971). See also, Koesler v. Harvey Applicators, Inc., 416 F.Supp. 872 (E.D.La.1976) and Sassoni v. Savoie, 327 F.Supp. 474 (E.D.La.1971). This is consistent with the rule that "the right of direct action against a liability insurer in a Louisiana Court is expressly......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT