Satery v. State, 42521

Decision Date21 January 1970
Docket NumberNo. 42521,42521
PartiesLarry Wayne SATERY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Charles W. Tessmer, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., John B. Tolle, Camille Elliott, James P. Finstrom and J R. Ormesher, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The offense is unlawful possession of marihuana; the punishment, two years.

Upon the waiver in writing of a jury, this cause was tried on a plea of not guilty before the court.

In his first ground of error, the appellant contends that the trial court erred in not excluding the evidence seized at the appellant's residence because the search warrant authorizing the search was invalid in that the affidavit did not state probable cause and that the reliability of the informant was not shown by sufficient fact as to when, where and what cases said informant had shown his reliability.

The pertinent portions of the affidavit for the search warrant read:

'* * * one Larry Wayne Satery and persons unknown did then and there unlawfully possess and does at this time unlawfully possess a narcotic drug and a dangerous drug, to-wit: Marihuana and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in a residence being described as single story, white, frame, dwelling located at 8930 Diceman Drive in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, which said residence is possessed, occupied, under the control and charge of Larry Wayne Satery and persons unknown.

'My belief of the aforesaid statement is based on the following facts:

'I have been informed of the foregoing set-out facts by a person, who I know to be reliable, credible and trustworthy, who states the following facts: The affiant has received information from a confidential source that Larry Wayne Satery has a large quantity of marihuana and approximately two-thousand tablets of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide in his possession at his residence located at 8930 Diceman Drive. That the informant has been to the location within the past twenty-four hours and has observed Larry Wayne Satery smoke a marihuana cigarette. The informant stated that Larry Wayne Satery had a large bowl full of marihuana on the coffee table in the living room and that there were several pipes on the coffee table near the bowl of marihuana. The informant further stated that Larry Wayne Satery returned from out of town with two-thousand tablets of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide and has them concealed in his residence. The affiant and other officers of the narcotic section have had the location under surveillance for the past several days and have observed several hippie type people, some of whom are known marihuana users, come to and leave the location. The affiant has received information from the informant in the past regarding narcotics and the information has always proved to be true and correct. The affiant has received information about Larry Wayne Satery from other informants and the information is the same.'

It is concluded that the affidavit sets forth a sufficient factual basis to satisfy the magistrate that grounds existed and authorized his finding that probable cause was shown for the issuance of the warrant....

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Fierro v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 8 Enero 1986
    ...that a certain green leafy plant substance is marihuana. Miller v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 570, 330 S.W.2d 466 (1959); Satery v. State, 455 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Jordan v. State, 486 S.W.2d 784 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Boothe v. State, 474 S.W.2d 219 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Houlihan v. State, 551......
  • Haynes v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 14 Diciembre 1971
    ...the United States Supreme Court in Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, supra, e.g., Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938; Satery v. State, TexCr.App., 455 S.W.2d 294; Slaton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d Appellant's contentions that the parol recitation by the arresting officer concernin......
  • Kendysh v. Holy Spirit BAOC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • 18 Junio 1987
    ... ... Spirit Church), is an ecclesiastical corporation which was organized under the laws of the State of Michigan on May 10, 1971, with its principal office at 14861 Collison, East Detroit, Michigan ... ...
  • $7058.84 in U.S. Currency v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 4 Octubre 2000
    ...(Tex. Crim. App. 1971), overruled on other grounds, Leday v. State, 983 S.W.2d 713, 721 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Satery v. State, 455 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970); Miller v. State, 168 Tex. Crim. 570, 330 S.W.2d 466, 468 (1959); Hernandez v. State, 137 Tex. Crim. 343, 129 S.W.2d 30......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT