Saugatuck Dunes Coastal Alliance v. Saugatuck Twp.

Decision Date08 May 2020
Docket NumberCOA: 342588,346677,SC: 160358-9
Citation942 N.W.2d 36 (Mem)
Parties SAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAUGATUCK TOWNSHIP, Saugatuck Township Zoning Board of Appeals, and North Shores of Saugatuck, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the "party aggrieved" standard of MCL 125.3605 requires a party to show some special damages not common to other property owners similarly situated, see Olsen v. Jude & Reed, LLC , 325 Mich. App. 170, 924 N.W.2d 889 (2018) ; (2) whether the meaning of "person aggrieved" in MCL 125.3604(1) differs from that of "party aggrieved" in MCL 125.3605, and if so what standard applies; and (3) whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the Allegan Circuit Court’s dismissal of appellant’s appeals from the decisions of the Saugatuck Township Zoning Board of Appeals. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall file supplemental briefs within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellees shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the latter of the appellees’ briefs. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Environmental Law & Policy Center and National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States are invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Saugatuck Dunes Coastal Alliance v. Saugatuck Twp.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 22, 2022
    ...appealed both circuit court decisions in the Court of Appeals, and the Court of Appeals consolidated the cases.6 Saugatuck Dunes Coastal Alliance v Saugatuck Twp , unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered January 22, 2019 (Docket Nos. 342588, 346677, and 346679).7 After determinin......
  • People v. Katzman
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • May 8, 2020

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT