Savage v. Azar

Decision Date28 March 2018
Docket NumberCase No. 15–cv–00791 (CRC)
Citation301 F.Supp.3d 114
Parties Wanda SAVAGE, Plaintiff, v. Alex AZAR, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Columbia

Wanda Savage, View Park, CA, pro se.

James Lawrence Fuchs, Snider and Associates, LLC, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff.

Kenneth A. Adebonojo, U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District JudgePlaintiff Wanda Savage worked for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from 2008 to 2014. She claims that, during her tenure, the Department took a host of discriminatory and retaliatory actions against her based on her race, sex, and disability status; that it retaliated against her for filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; and that it failed to reasonably accommodate her disability. The Department has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.

I. Background
A. Factual History
1. Savage's History with the Department

Throughout her time at the Department, Ms. Savage worked in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, created after Hurricane Katrina "to lead the nation in preventing, preparing for, and responding to the adverse health effects of public health emergencies and disasters." Public Health Emergency, U.S. Dep't Health & Human Servs., https://perma.cc/FPB4–XQ9F (last visited March 26, 2018). Savage was hired to work in a sub-office called the Office of Financial Planning and Analysis ("OFPA"). Decl. of Belinda Thomas Blackwell Supp. Mot. Dismiss ("Thomas Blackwell Decl.") at 1 (ECF No. 44–3). She began working in September 2008 as a Senior Program Analyst for OFPA's Management Assurance Division. Id. Ex. 1. She was hired at the GS–15 level and served as a "Team Leader" in the Division. Id. At the time, Savage's immediate supervisor was Brian Sparry, who was Deputy Director for the Division, a white male and, like Savage, a GS–15 employee. Decl. of John Joseph Petillo Supp. Mot. Dismiss ("Petillo Decl. I") ¶ 2 (ECF No. 44–4). Her higher-level supervisor was OFPA's Director, John ("Jay") Petillo. Id.

In March 2009, Petillo granted Mr. Sparry a schedule change that allowed him to begin work at 7:00 AM and leave at 3:30 PM. Sparry had applied for this modified schedule as an accommodation for a recent heart attack. See Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Summ. J. Ex. 5, at 135–36. While the Department did not conclude that Sparry's condition amounted to a protected disability, Petillo allowed the reduced schedule anyway because of Sparry's heart condition and because of a divorce agreement that required Sparry to be home during certain hours. Id. at 136.

Around this same time, Petillo authorized Savage to change to a compressed "5/4/9" schedule—working nine out of every ten days, but for nine hours (instead of eight) for most of those days. Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Summ. J. Ex. 5, at 134–136. As Team Leader, Savage covered for Sparry when he was out of the office. Id. at 146.

Savage found the job very stressful and unpleasant, and in several emails to Petillo throughout 2009 she complained about the Division's dysfunction. See Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Dismiss ("Pl.'s MTD Exs.") at 87, 92, 126–27 (ECF No. 48).2 While the details and frequency of their communication are disputed, it is not disputed that in March 2009 she emailed Petillo that she wanted to be reassigned outside of the Management Assurance Division. See id. at 92. Petillo attempted to find Savage a position in the Department's Office of Finance, but the supervisor of that office informed him that she was not interested in accepting Savage for the position. Depo. of John Joseph Petillo at 107–08 (ECF No. 82–1).

Meanwhile, in April 2009, Savage had filed the first in a series of administrative complaints with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission ("EEOC"). She alleged that she was subjected to a host of adverse actions because of her race, sex, and disability status. Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Summ. J. Ex. 16, at 2. Petillo was interviewed by an EEOC investigator about at least one of these complaints. Id. Ex. 11, at ¶ 5.

Mr. Sparry was transferred from the Management Assurance Division to OFPA's Communications Office in November 2009. Petillo Decl. I ¶ 3. He had sought this transfer as an accommodation for his heart condition and because the job caused him "extreme stress." Pl.'s MTD Exs. at 272. A memorandum addressed from Petillo to Sparry explained that, while the Department concluded that his condition was not a disability for purposes of the Rehabilitation Act, he would nevertheless grant the transfer request. Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Summ. J. Ex. 2. Once Sparry left the Division, Petillo designated Savage as its Acting Deputy Director. Petillo became Savage's direct supervisor. Petillo Decl. I ¶ 2.

The parties dispute the extent to which Savage's job duties changed once she became Acting Deputy Director. Petillo, citing Savage's performance plans and evaluations (or "PMAPs"), maintains that her responsibilities remained largely the same, and that the assumption of the title of Acting Deputy Director was merely nominal. Petillo Decl. I ¶¶ 4–7; id. Ex. 1–3. Savage counters that these same PMAPs demonstrate that she performed supervisory duties distinct from her previous role. Pl.'s MTD Exs. at 66. Petillo stated that the Division's responsibilities were greatly reduced, and that he gave Savage ample staff and resources to run the Division. See Second Supp'l Decl. of John Joseph Petillo Supp. Mot. Summ. J. ("Petillo Decl. II") ¶ 3 (ECF No. 82–1 at 116–17). Savage disagreed; she told Petillo that the Division was understaffed and underresourced. Pl.'s MTD Exs. at 111.

Savage was Acting Deputy Director for almost two years. For part of this time, she was on medical leave following a surgery and then worked remotely. Petillo Decl. II ¶ 6. Things remained rocky, however—Savage sought a transfer out of the Division in April 2010, this time in a three-page email to a human resources officer. Pl.'s MTD Exs. at 148–50.

By January 2011, Savage had returned to the office and was working on her 5/4/9 schedule. That March, Petillo asked Savage whether she would be interested in assuming the Deputy Director role permanently. Petillo Decl. I ¶ 8. He explained that she—like all permanent Deputy Directors—would be required to give up her 5/4/9 schedule because the Department preferred supervisors to be in the office all the time. Id.; see also Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Dismiss at 228–30. Savage, not wanting to relinquish her schedule, declined the position. Petillo Decl. I ¶ 9. A few months later, Petillo advertised the job throughout HHS. Id. Savage applied and, along with five other candidates, was selected for an interview. Id. ¶ 11. A panel of four employees interviewed those six candidates and recommended that Petillo choose Javier Lopez (a Hispanic male) for the position. Id.; see Blackwell Thomas Decl. Ex. 19. After reviewing the candidates' written materials, contacting their references, and consulting with the interview panel, Petillo hired Lopez, who began working in October 2011. Petillo Decl. I ¶ 12.

When Lopez began as Deputy Director, Petillo notified Savage that he would be reassigning her outside the Management Assurance Division: effective January 2012, she would become a Records Management liaison for OFPA and would report directly to Petillo. Id. ¶ 21; see Pl.'s MTD Exs. at 280–81. Petillo explained in a memorandum addressed to Savage that he had made the assignment "[i]n response to [her] stated dissatisfaction in your current role." Pl.'s MTD Exs. at 280. Savage did not want to be transferred and sent emails to that effect to Petillo and other Department officials. Petillo Decl. I ¶ 21. Department management attempted to mediate the issue, but those efforts were unsuccessful, and in January Petillo reassigned Savage as planned. Id. Savage worked in her new position for nearly three years until she was terminated from the Department in 2014. Id. ¶ 2. (That ultimate termination is not relevant to this lawsuit.)

2. Savage's Accommodation Requests

Savage had been injured in a car accident in 2007 and experienced complications from knee surgeries following the accident. Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Summ. J. Ex. 24, at 1–2. During her employment with the Department, she requested accommodations related to injuries stemming from the accident and surgeries. In March 2011, Savage lodged a request with the Department's human resources department seeking two accommodations: an office large enough for ergonomic equipment, and permission to work remotely from her home. Decl. of Christopher Tully Supp. Def.'s Mot. Summ. J. ("Tully Decl.") Ex. 1, at Bates No. 25–2358 (ECF No. 80–3). Savage authorized the Department to seek her medical records from her orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Peter Glieberman, to corroborate her request. Id. at 25–2308. The request was forwarded to Federal Occupational Health—an agency that reviews accommodation requests—which assigned it to one of its staff physicians. Id. at 25–2349, –2354. In April, that physician faxed Dr. Glieberman a series of questions about Savage's condition and evaluation. Id. at 25–2325. The fax was confirmed as received, but Dr. Glieberman never responded. Unable to reach Dr. Glieberman after several attempts, in May 2011 Federal Occupational Health notified the Department's human resources officer that it lacked "sufficient information to determine whether or not Ms. Savage is a person with a disability, nor to make a recommendation in this case. Should further information become available, her case can be reconsidered." Id. at 25–2349.

In September 2011, at the Department's urging, Federal Occupational Health tried twice more to call Dr. Glieberman and sent him another fax. Id. at 25–2313 to –2314. It still received no response and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Chambers v. Dist. of Columbia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • June 3, 2022
    ...2007 WL 2935411, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 20, 2007). Our district judges have done so in dozens more cases. See, e.g. , Savage v. Azar , 301 F. Supp. 3d 114, 129 (2018) ; Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms , 563 F. Supp. 2d 228, 240 (2008) ; Oliver-Simon v. Nicholson , 384 F. Su......
  • Quynh Vu Bain v. Office of Attorney Gen.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • December 23, 2022
    ...Baloch, 550 F.3d at 1196-97 (treating Title VII, ADEA, and Rehabilitation Act alike for purposes of adverse action); Savage v. Azar, 301 F.Supp.3d 114, 124 (D.D.C. 2018) (same). This requirement was a judicial gloss on the statutory text, which prohibits employers from discriminating agains......
  • Congress v. Dist. of Columbia
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • December 18, 2020
    ...discrimination provision); see 29 U.S.C. § 791(f) (incorporating ADA standards in 42 U.S.C. § 12111 et seq. ); Savage v. Azar, 301 F. Supp. 3d 114, 123 (D.D.C. 2018) (Cooper, J.), aff'd, No. 18-5287, 2020 WL 1919639 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 8, 2020) (recognizing the same).As described above, Congres......
  • Degefu v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • March 30, 2023
    ... ... retaliate by transferring her to a new position that she ... neither requested nor agreed to. See Savage v. Azar , ... 301 F.Supp.3d 114, 130 (D.D.C. 2018) (finding genuine issue ... of material fact as to whether employee's reassignment, ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT'S UNREASONABLE FOCUS ON THE INDIVIDUAL.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 170 No. 7, July 2022
    • July 1, 2022
    ...employee's request for an ergonomic assessment in a cashier position where repetitive motion injuries were possible); Savage v. Azar, 301 F. Supp. 3d 114, 132 (D.D.C. 2018) (finding that the employer did not act in bad faith in addressing an employee's accommodation requests, including addr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT