Savage v. Comm'r Of Correction
Decision Date | 27 July 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 30687.,30687. |
Citation | 122 Conn.App. 800,998 A.2d 1247 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | Jamell SAVAGEv.COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. |
Robert J. McKay, special public defender, filed a brief for the appellant (petitioner).
Gail P. Hardy, state's attorney, Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, and Brenda Hans, deputy assistant state's attorney, filed a brief for the appellee (respondent).
LAVINE, ALVORD and BEAR, Js.
The petitioner, Jamell Savage, appeals following the habeas court's denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion when it denied his petition for certification to appeal and improperly rejected his claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. More specifically, the petitioner claims that there was merit to his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel failed to file and to prosecute adequately a motion for a speedy trial and a motion to dismiss, and, therefore, the court should have granted his habeas petition or, at a minimum, granted his petition for certification to appeal.1 We dismiss the appeal.
After pleading guilty pursuant to the Alford doctrine; see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); the petitioner was convicted of sexual assault in the first degree pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-70, and the court sentenced him to a term of fifteen years incarceration, execution suspended after six years, with ten years probation. Approximately sixteen months later, the petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, followed by a second amended petition. Following a hearing on the second amended petition, the court Nazzaro, J., denied the petition and, finding no merit to the petitioner's claims, then denied the petition for certification to appeal. This appeal followed.
The petitioner claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file and to prosecute adequately a motion for a speedy trial followed by a motion to dismiss.2 After a hearing, the habeas court considered the petitioner's claim and rejected it, specifically finding that the petitioner had failed to prove that he was prejudiced by counsel's alleged failures. Concluding that the petitioner was unable to prove prejudice, the court did not consider whether counsel's performance was deficient.
After carefully reviewing the record and briefs, we conclude, as a matter of law, that the petitioner waived his right to raise this claim when he pleaded guilty under the Alford doctrine. (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Szarwak v. Warden, 167 Conn. 10, 22, 355 A.2d 49 (1974).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Simmons
...guilty plea, a defendant waives his right to raise any nonjurisdictional claims of error. See, e.g., Savage v. Commissioner of Correction , 122 Conn. App. 800, 802–803, 998 A.2d 1247 (2010). The court did not ask the defendant for input as to the propriety of the agreement, and the defendan......
-
State Of Conn. v. Nero., 30753.
...to see Jenny in order to “turn [him] on.” Shortly thereafter, the defendant made increasingly aggressive sexual comments, saying, “you 122 Conn.App. 800turn me on too much,” and, “you make me feel special down there.” He also made comments about lifting up Jenny's skirt, kissing her “all ov......
-
Owusu v. Warden, State Prison
... ... habeas relief is not available. D’Onofrio v. Commissioner ... of Correction, supra, 36 Conn.[App. 691, 693-94, 652 ... A.2d 1058 (1995) ] ... (Citation omitted.) ... Describing the petitioner’s case as analogous to Savage ... v. Commissioner , 122 Conn.App. 800, 998 A.2d 1247 (1990) ... (finding that a ... ...
-
Diaz v. Comm'r of Corr.
...proceedings." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Johnson , supra, at 42, 751 A.2d 298. In Savage v. Commissioner of Correction , 122 Conn. App. 800, 802, 998 A.2d 1247 (2010), this court dismissed an appeal in which the petitioner, after pleading guilty pursuant to the Alford doct......