Sawyers v. Sawyers, 14461

Decision Date13 December 1976
Docket NumberNo. 14461,14461
Citation558 P.2d 607
PartiesAnn J. SAWYERS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Don M. SAWYERS, Defendant and Appellant.
CourtUtah Supreme Court

Don M. Sawyers pro se.

Bruce E. Humberstone, Salt Lake City, Udell R. Jensen, Nephi, for plaintiff and respondent.

WILKINS, Justice:

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment and order of the District Court in and for Salt Lake County, dated January 8, 1976, upon petitions by each of the parties to modify the terms of a decree of divorce dated November 27, 1976.

Plaintiff was represented by counsel and defendant appeared before this court pro se, though he was represented by counsel in the district court. In his brief, defendant disagrees with many of said court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and modified decree. He seeks to have the lower court's decision entitled 'Judgment and Order Upon Petitions for Modification of Decree of Divorce Of Both Parties' reversed in several particulars.

The clerk of the district court transmitted to this court pursuant to the designation 'all of the original papers . . . on file herein . . .'. Nothing else has been received by this court in this matter except the briefs filed by the parties. No certificate was filed with the clerk of the district court as required by Rule 75(a)(1), Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, that a transcript of evidence had been ordered or that defendant did not intend to rely on said transcript. And no copy of the transcript by the reporter in the district court was included in this record on appeal, nor is an abstract of testimony presented for this court's consideration.

Basically, the defendant's brief consists of a statement of facts and a commentary on the nineteen paragraphs of the district court's judgment and order, which commentary substantially consists of disagreement with said court's rulings and an attempt to have this court consider facts which defendant claims existed subsequent to the date of the lower court's judgment.

Plaintiff in her brief disputes the matters raised by defendant which are at variance with the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment and order of the district court.

The defendant in oral argument before this court stated that he was primarily appealing the award of judgment to plaintiff of (1) $750.00 for attorney's fees (agreeing though to an amount of $300.00) and (2) $578.00 for delinquent alimony and child support.

Defendant's contentions and points on this appeal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Bevan v. J.H. Const. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • August 23, 1983
    ...Judge, sat. 1 Estate of Thorley, Utah, 579 P.2d 927 (1978); Bagnall v. Suburbia Land Co., Utah, 579 P.2d 917 (1978); Sawyers v. Sawyers, Utah, 558 P.2d 607 (1976).2 Plaintiff David Kim Bevan was a former employee of defendants' and expected to provide much of the labor.3 See 22 Am.Jur.2d Da......
  • State v. Verikokides
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • October 4, 1996
    ...decision. Fackrell v. Fackrell, 740 P.2d 1318, 1319-20 (Utah 1987); State v. Taylor, 664 P.2d 439, 447 (Utah 1983); Sawyers v. Sawyers, 558 P.2d 607, 608-09 (Utah 1976); Briggs v. Holcomb, 740 P.2d 281, 283 (Utah.Ct.App.1987); see also State v. Menzies, 845 P.2d 220, 241 (Utah 1992) ("[C]ri......
  • Thompson v. Thompson
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • April 16, 2009
    ...only in juxtaposition to a record by which [the trial court's] rulings and decisions on disputes can be measured." Sawyers v. Sawyers, 558 P.2d 607, 608 (Utah 1976). "In the absence of a record which allows us to review the assigned errors, we must presume that the trial court's ruling was ......
  • Prudential Capital Group Co. v. Mattson
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 1990
    ...BMG Corp., 700 P.2d 1068, 1070 (Utah 1985). Wilderness Bldg. Systems, Inc. v. Chapman, 699 P.2d 766, 769 (Utah 1985); Sawyers v. Sawyers, 558 P.2d 607, 608-09 (Utah 1976). Where an appellant challenges the amount of damages awarded under the contract, we affirm the court's award of damages ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT