Scamman v. Sondheim
Decision Date | 05 February 1952 |
Citation | 97 N.H. 280,86 A.2d 329 |
Parties | SCAMMAN v. SONDHEIM et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
George R. Scammon, Exeter, for plaintiff, filed no brief.
Charles M. Dale, Portsmouth and Ray E. Burkett, Concord, for defendants.
William H. Sleeper and Wayne J. Mullavey, Exeter, for guardian of the minor legatees.
In the absence of special circumstances, it is the general rule that an executor or administrator is the only proper party to bring or defend actions relating to the personal estate of the deceased. Reynolds v. Kenney, 87 N.H. 313, 314, 179 A. 16, 98 A.L.R. 751; Mitchell v. Smith's Estate, 90 N.H. 36, 41, 4 A.2d 355; Champollion v. Corbin, 71 N.H. 78, 51 A. 674. Niemi v. Boston and Maine Railroad, 87 N.H. 1, 5, 173 A. 361, 364, 175 A. 245. The above authorities support the ruling of the Trial Court that the guardian was not entitled to intervene in these proceedings as a matter of right.
Special circumstances exist in those cases where the personal representative of the estate fails or neglects to bring or defend an action relating to the personal estate, is guilty of fraud or collusion or has a conflicting or adverse interest in the estate. Bean v. Bean, 71 N.H. 538, 53 A. 907; Bean v. Bean, 74 N.H. 404, 68 A. 409. None of these factors exist in the present case. The executors are willing and able to control the litigation and the record discloses no other special circumstances which would warrant intervention in behalf of the legatees. See Anno. 158 A.L.R. 729.
The right of a party to intervene in pending litigation in this state has been rather freely allowed as a matter of practice without the aid of statute permitting it. Carlton v. Patterson, 29 N.H. 580, 586. As early as 1828 practical intervention was accomplished in Buckman v. Buckman, 4 N.H. 319. See 4 Moore, Federal Practice (1950) p. 13. However, the right to intervene has been usually determined as a matter of discretion by the Trial Court. Parsons v. Eureka Powder Works, 48 N.H. 66, 67. Since the legatees may protect their interests in the probate court and have recourse to the executors' bond, it...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Porter v. Dartmouth College, Civil No. 07-cv-28-JL.
...is the only proper party to bring or defend actions relating to the personal estate of the deceased." Scamman v. Sondheim, 97 N.H. 280, 281, 86 A.2d 329 (1952). The plaintiffs have not strictly complied with the statute in this case. They did bring suit within the three-year limitations per......
-
Brzica v. Trs. of Dartmouth Coll.
...a party to intervene in pending litigation in this state has been rather freely allowed as a matter of practice." Scamman v. Sondheim, 97 N.H. 280, 281, 86 A.2d 329 (1952). A trial court should grant a motion to intervene if the party seeking to intervene has a right involved in the trial a......
-
Snyder v. New Hampshire Sav. Bank, 90-055
...stated that "the right to intervene has been usually determined as a matter of discretion by the Trial Court." Scamman v. Sondheim, 97 N.H. 280, 281, 86 A.2d 329, 330 (1952). Thus, we may not overturn the trial court's decision unless we are persuaded that the court abused its To determine ......
-
Bader Co. v. Concord Elec. Co., 5814
...properly permitted the trustee to intervene in these proceedings. Parsons v. Eureka Powder Works, 48 N.H. 66, 67. See Scamman v. Sondheim, 97 N.H. 280, 281, 86 A.2d 329. Bader maintains, however, that Concord Electric by not objecting to the claimed mechanic's lien against its property, and......