Scanlan v. Townsend
Decision Date | 06 November 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 89853–7.,89853–7. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | Theresa SCANLAN, Respondent, v. Karlin TOWNSEND and “John Doe” Townsend, wife and husband, Petitioners. |
Michael E. Abrahamson, Jill Renee Skinner, Hollenbeck, Lancaster, Miller & Andrews, Bellevue, WA, for Petitioner.
Thomas Edmund Jacobs, Kyle David Drinnon, Attorney at Law, Puyallup, WA, G. Parker Reich, Jacobs & Jacobs, Puyallup, WA, for Respondent.
¶ 1 After Theresa Scanlan filed a personal injury action against Karlin Townsend,1 a process server delivered a copy of the summons and complaint to Townsend's father at his home. But Townsend did not live at her father's home. Townsend's father later handed the summons and complaint directly to Townsend within the statute of limitations.
¶ 2 The trial court dismissed for lack of service, and the Court of Appeals reversed. Scanlan v. Townsend, 178 Wash.App. 609, 315 P.3d 594 (2013). We granted review of Townsend's claim that Scanlan failed to comply with RCW 4.28.080(15), which requires serving a copy of the summons “to the defendant personally, or by leaving a copy of the summons at the house of his or her usual abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then resident therein.” Scanlan v. Townsend, 180 Wash.2d 1008, 325 P.3d 914 (2014). Because Scanlan establishes effective personal service on Townsend, we affirm the Court of Appeals,
¶ 3 On October 28, 2008, Scanlan and Townsend were involved in a car accident in Federal Way, Washington. Clerk's Papers (CP) at 1–2. On October 27, 2011, Scanlan filed a personal injury action against Townsend. Id.
¶ 4 On November 8, 2011, Scanlan asked ABC Investigations to locate Townsend's current residential address. CP at 37. ABC conducted a records search and identified two addresses—one in Puyallup, Washington, and one in Vancouver, Washington. Id. The Puyallup address Id. Court records identified a particular Vancouver, Washington, address as Townsend's address “as of 10/04/2010.” Id. This address “appear [ed] on a[ ] [Social Security number]/Address trace for the Defendant reported between 1991 and 2009.” Id. And Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL) records showed this address for Townsend “as of 07/25/2007.” Id. Clark County tax assessor records listed Townsend's father, Charles William Pyne, “with whom the Defendant has resided in the past, as the current owner of the real property at [the Vancouver] address.” Id. The DOL record showed a vehicle registered to Townsend with her father listed as a co-owner. Id.
¶ 5 An ABC process server tried to serve a copy of the summons and complaint upon Townsend at the Puyallup address on December 8, 2011. Id. The resident at this address told the process server that he did not know Townsend. Id.
¶ 6 Almost two weeks later, the process server tried to serve a copy of the summons and complaint upon Townsend at the Vancouver address. Id. The process server's declaration of service states that on December 21, 2011, the process server delivered two copies of the summons and complaint at a specified address in “VANCOUVER, Clark County, WA,” to someone he described as “Bill White, CORESIDENT ... a person of suitable age and discretion who stated they reside at the defendant's/respondent's usual place of abode listed above.” CP at 3 (boldface omitted).
¶ 7 Townsend therefore moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of service on March 15, 2012. CP at 4–9. To support this motion, Townsend filed a declaration stating that she had lived at the Puyallup address from March 2011 to October 2011 and had lived in Auburn since October 2011. CP at 11. She stated that the Vancouver address Id. Townsend also stated, “My usual abode at the time of attempted service was my home at [a specified address in] Auburn, Washington.”Id.
¶ 8 In opposition to Townsend's motion to dismiss, Scanlan submitted a declaration from an ABC investigator explaining the efforts to locate Townsend's residential address.
CP at 45 (boldface omitted).
¶ 9 Scanlan claimed that she established effective service on Townsend through substitute service of process because the process server “left a copy of the summons and complaint at the Defendant's usual abode with the defendant's father, a person of suitable age and discretion, who also resided at that house.” CP at 25. Scanlan asked the court to deny Townsend's motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to conduct an evidentiary hearing or continue the hearing on the motion to conduct discovery. Id. The trial court reserved its ruling on the motion. Verbatim Report of Proceedings (VRP) (July 13, 2012) at 17–18.
¶ 10 Later, in a deposition, Townsend testified that her father delivered the summons and complaint to her at the end of December 2011 or in early January 2012 but did not specify exactly how he served her:
CP at 75 (boldface omitted).
¶ 11 After discovery, Scanlan filed an amended response to Townsend's motion to dismiss for lack of service. She argued that the process server CP at 90. Scanlan also argued that Townsend's father served Townsend personally “by giving the summons and complaint to his daughter when she came to visit his Vancouver house in late 2011 or early 2012.” CP at 95.
CP at 123–24. Townsend argued that this declaration demonstrated service of process was not effective because “[t]here can be no question that the Vancouver, WA address was NOT the usual abode of Defendant Karlin Townsend (now Emerson) at the time of purported service.” CP at 120. She also argued that her father's “accidental service” on her was not valid personal service. Id.¶ 13 At the hearing on Townsend's motion to dismiss, however, her attorney stipulated that Townsend's father delivered the summons and complaint to Townsend personally...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re G.M.W.
...Townsend, however, no longer resided there. The father, who was not named in the lawsuit, then delivered the summons to Townsend. 181 Wn.2d at 840-41. The court held that father had served Townsend. "[D]irect, hand-to-hand-but 'secondhand'-service" may be sufficient so long as the service i......
-
Auer v. Leach
... ... Proper ... service of process has both constitutional and statutory ... dimensions. Scanlan v. Townsend, 181 Wn.2d 838, 847, ... 336 P.3d 1155 (2014). The nonconstitutional dimension, at ... issue here, is governed by both ... ...
-
Auer v. Leach
... ... Proper ... service of process has both constitutional and statutory ... dimensions. Scanlan v. Townsend, 181 Wn.2d 838, 847, ... 336 P.3d 1155 (2014). The nonconstitutional dimension, at ... issue here, is governed by both ... ...
-
Auer v. Leach
...Knapp. 1. Applicable Legal Principles Proper service of process has both constitutional and statutory dimensions. Scanlan v. Townsend, 181 Wn.2d 838, 847, 336 P.3d 1155 (2014). The nonconstitutional dimension, atissue here, is governed by both statute and court rules. RCW 4.16.170; chapter ......