Schackman v. Arnebergh, No. 1186
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 387 U.S. 427,18 L.Ed.2d 865,87 S.Ct. 1622 |
| Parties | Harry SCHACKMAN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH |
| Decision Date | 29 May 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 1186 |
v.
Roger ARNEBERGH.
-Burton Marks, for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns, for appellees Arnebergh and others.
Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes, for appellees Younger and others.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee Lynch.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281—2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon oy age Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed.2d 794, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 33, 17 L.Ed.2d 3.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Motion granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Feinberg v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., No. 74-1970
...not to the Supreme Court, even though the case on its merits would be required to be heard by a three-judge court. Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Wilson v. City of Port Lavaca, 391 U.S. 352, 88 S.Ct. 1502, 20 L.Ed.2d 636 (1968); Mengelkoch v. Ind......
-
People v. Adler, Cr. A
...in its California context. Schackman v. Arnebergh (C.D.Cal.1966), 258 F.Supp. 983, appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (1967), 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 rehearing denied (1967), 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204, was an unsuccessful effort to enjoin a pending......
-
Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO, No. C-72-1689.
...Court, 334 F.Supp. 1289, 1299-1300 (E.D.La. 1971); Schackman v. Arnebergh, 258 F.Supp. 983, 993 (C.D. Cal. 1966), appeal dismissed, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967), rehearing denied, 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204 (1967). See also City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 ......
-
Miller v. Reddin, No. 68-712.
...a three-judge court under 28 United States Code, Section 2281. Schackman v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 983, 995 (1966), appeal dismissed 387 U.S. 427, 293 F. Supp. 235 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Pinkus v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 966, 1005 (1966); Smith v. State of Californ......
-
Feinberg v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., No. 74-1970
...not to the Supreme Court, even though the case on its merits would be required to be heard by a three-judge court. Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Wilson v. City of Port Lavaca, 391 U.S. 352, 88 S.Ct. 1502, 20 L.Ed.2d 636 (1968); Mengelkoch v. Ind......
-
People v. Adler, Cr. A
...in its California context. Schackman v. Arnebergh (C.D.Cal.1966), 258 F.Supp. 983, appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (1967), 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 rehearing denied (1967), 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204, was an unsuccessful effort to enjoin a pending......
-
Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO, No. C-72-1689.
...Court, 334 F.Supp. 1289, 1299-1300 (E.D.La. 1971); Schackman v. Arnebergh, 258 F.Supp. 983, 993 (C.D. Cal. 1966), appeal dismissed, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967), rehearing denied, 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204 (1967). See also City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 ......
-
Miller v. Reddin, No. 68-712.
...a three-judge court under 28 United States Code, Section 2281. Schackman v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 983, 995 (1966), appeal dismissed 387 U.S. 427, 293 F. Supp. 235 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Pinkus v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 966, 1005 (1966); Smith v. State of Californ......