Schackman v. Arnebergh, No. 1186

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation387 U.S. 427,18 L.Ed.2d 865,87 S.Ct. 1622
PartiesHarry SCHACKMAN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH
Decision Date29 May 1967
Docket NumberNo. 1186

387 U.S. 427
87 S.Ct. 1622
18 L.Ed.2d 865
Harry SCHACKMAN et al.

v.

Roger ARNEBERGH.

No. 1186.
May 29, 1967.

-Burton Marks, for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns, for appellees Arnebergh and others.

Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes, for appellees Younger and others.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee Lynch.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281—2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon oy age Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed.2d 794, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 33, 17 L.Ed.2d 3.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Motion granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 practice notes
  • Feinberg v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., No. 74-1970
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 17, 1975
    ...not to the Supreme Court, even though the case on its merits would be required to be heard by a three-judge court. Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Wilson v. City of Port Lavaca, 391 U.S. 352, 88 S.Ct. 1502, 20 L.Ed.2d 636 (1968); Mengelkoch v. Ind......
  • People v. Adler, Cr. A
    • United States
    • United States Superior Court (California)
    • March 21, 1972
    ...in its California context. Schackman v. Arnebergh (C.D.Cal.1966), 258 F.Supp. 983, appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (1967), 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 rehearing denied (1967), 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204, was an unsuccessful effort to enjoin a pending......
  • Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO, No. C-72-1689.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • May 16, 1974
    ...Court, 334 F.Supp. 1289, 1299-1300 (E.D.La. 1971); Schackman v. Arnebergh, 258 F.Supp. 983, 993 (C.D. Cal. 1966), appeal dismissed, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967), rehearing denied, 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204 (1967). See also City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 ......
  • Miller v. Reddin, No. 68-712.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • November 18, 1968
    ...a three-judge court under 28 United States Code, Section 2281. Schackman v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 983, 995 (1966), appeal dismissed 387 U.S. 427, 293 F. Supp. 235 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Pinkus v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 966, 1005 (1966); Smith v. State of Californ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
48 cases
  • Feinberg v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., No. 74-1970
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 17, 1975
    ...not to the Supreme Court, even though the case on its merits would be required to be heard by a three-judge court. Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Wilson v. City of Port Lavaca, 391 U.S. 352, 88 S.Ct. 1502, 20 L.Ed.2d 636 (1968); Mengelkoch v. Ind......
  • People v. Adler, Cr. A
    • United States
    • United States Superior Court (California)
    • March 21, 1972
    ...in its California context. Schackman v. Arnebergh (C.D.Cal.1966), 258 F.Supp. 983, appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (1967), 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 rehearing denied (1967), 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204, was an unsuccessful effort to enjoin a pending......
  • Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO, No. C-72-1689.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • May 16, 1974
    ...Court, 334 F.Supp. 1289, 1299-1300 (E.D.La. 1971); Schackman v. Arnebergh, 258 F.Supp. 983, 993 (C.D. Cal. 1966), appeal dismissed, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967), rehearing denied, 389 U.S. 893, 88 S.Ct. 16, 19 L.Ed.2d 204 (1967). See also City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 ......
  • Miller v. Reddin, No. 68-712.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • November 18, 1968
    ...a three-judge court under 28 United States Code, Section 2281. Schackman v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 983, 995 (1966), appeal dismissed 387 U.S. 427, 293 F. Supp. 235 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Pinkus v. Arnebergh, D.C., 258 F.Supp. 966, 1005 (1966); Smith v. State of Californ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT