Scheehle v. Justices of Supreme Court, Arizona, 00-15457.
| Decision Date | 26 July 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 00-15457.,00-15457. |
| Citation | 315 F.3d 1191 |
| Parties | Mark V. SCHEEHLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Stanley G. Feldman, Charles E. Jones, Frederick J. Martone; Ruth V. Mcgregor; and Thomas A. Zlaket; Judges of the Superior Court of the State of Order Arizona, In and for the County of Maricopa: Michael R. Mcvey; Robert D. Myers; Jonathan H. Schwartz; And Christopher M. Skelly, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Mark V. Scheehle (argued), Pro Se, and Dorothy L. Scheehle, Scheehle Law Firm, P.L.C., Fountain Hills, AZ, for plaintiff-appellant.
Scott Bales (argued), Solicitor General, State of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-01095-SMM.
Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
The heart of Appellant's constitutional claim centers around whether he may be compelled, without just compensation, to participate as an arbitrator in the Maricopa County civil arbitration project. The Arizona Supreme Court, in response to a question certified to them, has determined that A.R.S. § 12-133 does not authorize the creation of an arbitration system mandating lawyer participation. We now remand to the district court to determine the present position of the parties and the jurisdictional and other status of the litigation in light of this development.
REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court
...the Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further consideration. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 315 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir.2003). ¶ 10 Upon remand, the district court again reaffirmed its rejection of Scheehle's federal constitutional arguments and dismissed them......
-
Scheehle v. Justices of Supreme Court of Ariz.
...the Arizona Supreme Court answered the certified question, we remanded the case to the district court. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona, 315 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir.2003). On remand, the district court, at Scheehle's request, again certified a question concerning the propriet......