Scheehle v. Justices of the Sup. Ct. of Arizona, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
Citation257 F.3d 1082
Docket NumberDEFENDANTS-APPELLEES,No. 00-15457,PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,00-15457
Parties(9th Cir. 2001) MARK V. SCHEEHLE,, v. JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STANLEY G. FELDMAN, CHARLES E. JONES, FREDERICK J. MARTONE, RUTH A. MCGREGOR, AND THOMAS A. ZLAKET; JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF OPINION ARIZONA,IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA: MICHAEL R. MCVEY, ROBERT D. MYERS, JONATHAN H. SCHWARTZ, AND CHRISTOPHER M. SKELLY,
Decision Date04 June 2001

NOTE: THIS OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. SEE NEW OPINION AT 269 F.3d 1127.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 5 Octubre 2005
    ...dismissed the state law claims. The Ninth Circuit initially affirmed the decision, Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 257 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir.2001), but then withdrew that opinion. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 269 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir.2001). It then certified a question t......
  • Scheehle v. Justices of Supreme Court of Ariz.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 15 Noviembre 2007
    ...3. Scheehle v. Justices of Supreme Court of State of Arizona, 269 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2001), withdrawing Scheehle v. Justices of Supreme Court of Arizona, 257 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir.2001). 4. The Appointment System appears to allow for recusals if the arbitration would interfere with an attorne......
  • Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Ct. of Arizona, 00-15457
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 29 Octubre 2001
    ...PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. ORDER WITHDRAWING OPINION The Opinion filed on July 26, 2001 and cited at 257 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2001), is ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Tilting the Justice System: from Adr as Idealistic Movement to a Segmented Market in Dispute Resolution
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 18-4, June 2002
    • Invalid date
    ...under the Fifth Amendment; ultimately, he lost in the Ninth Circuit. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Ariz., 257 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir. 2001). [15]. Marc Galanter, Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 L. & Soc'y Rev. 95 (1974); ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT