Schefe's Estate, In re
Decision Date | 04 March 1952 |
Citation | 52 N.W.2d 375,261 Wis. 113 |
Parties | In re SCHEFE'S ESTATE. SCHEFE et al. v. CROWLEY et al. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
On April 11, 1938 George Schefe and Anna, his wife, executed a joint will, parts of which are as follows:
* * *'
By its Fourth paragraph it devises and bequeaths to their son Elmer upon the death of the surviving testator their homestead farm, their farm personal property and household furnishings, subject to the payment charged upon the real estate of $1,000 to each of the three daughters, Irma, Florence and Evelyn. By the terms of the Fourth paragraph it is provided that in the event that it should become necessary during the lifetime of the survivor to dispose of this property the son Elmer should receive $6,000 as an equivalent. This paragraph contains the recital: 'This provision for Elmer Schefe is made in consideration of his working for us without pay, and to compensate him for the injury to his hand, and shall take absolute priority over all provisions for our other children, but in such case each of our said daughters shall next out of the residue receive One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) as hereinbefore bequeathed to each.'
Specific legacies are contained in paragraph Fifth.
By the terms of paragraph Sixth the residue of the estate is devised and bequeathed in equal shares to the three daughters.
On the day of the execution of the will the testators executed an agreement as follows:
'Whereas, the first party and the second party, are husband and wife, and are the owners in joint tenancy of a certain farm located in Winnebago County described as: 'The North half of the Northeast quarter (N 1/2 NE 1/4) of Section One (1) Township Twenty (20) Range Sixteen (16) containing eighty (80) acres of land, more or less, according to government survey,' and personal property located therein; and the parties also hold and have agreed to hold as joint owners all other property which they now own or may hereafter acquire while both parties are living, so that upon the death of one their entire estate becomes the sole and exclusive property of the survivor, and,
'Whereas, the parties are now 73 years of age and being uncertain as to who shall be the survivor and having considered the ultimate disposition of their joint property after the death of the survivor, and having in consideration of the promises each to the other mutually agreed to a joint disposition thereof effective upon the death of the survivor to the children of the parties and as to what each shall equitably receive, especially in regard to their son, Elmer Schefe, who for many years worked on their farm without pay, and was permanently injured while doing such work for which he was not compensated;
'Now, Therefore, It is mutually agreed in consideration of the promises one to the other made as herein specified:
'1. That immediately upon the execution and delivery of this agreement the parties shall make, publish and declare the last will and testament in the joint form set forth in Exhibit 'A' hereto annexed and hereby made a part hereof, as their joint last will and testament.
'2. That each party hereto expressly covenants with the other hereto not to revoke, cancel, annul, modify, amend or change such last will and testament, either in whole or in part, during the life of either party at any time, and covenants that he or she will permit such will to stand irrevocably up to the time of his or her death.
Anna Schefe did on October 31, 1940 leaving no separate estate. Shortly thereafter George left the farm to reside for a time with the daughter, Evelyn, and then with the daughters, Irma and Florence. In July, 1948 Florence was adjudged an incompetent which she still is. Irma died intestate on February 7, 1949, leaving an estate consisting of about $10,000 in savings account and her father her sole heir at law. In proceedings had upon the administration of her estate the balance, $8,186.12 was assigned to her father.
On May 12, 1949 George made another will which provides in substance that one-third of the property affected thereby should be held in trust and administered for the benefit of the incompetent daughter, Florence. The remainder over upon her death was to go to the grandchildren, Arthur Borchardt, Jr., and Darlene Ann Borchardt, and the balance of two-thirds was to go outright to the daughter, Evelyn Borchardt. It ackowledges the existence of the joint will and states, 'I have been advised that I have the right to make and publish this to be my last Will and Testament,' and, further, 'All former wills by me singularly made, are hereby revoked.'
Upon the death of George on May 26, 1950 the son, Elmer, made petition for the probate of the joint will. A petition was also filed by the daughter, Evelyn, for the probate of the second will. Both wills were admitted to probate. Elmer and Florence, the latter by her guardian ad litem, each made claim 'under express contract for the right, title and interest in and to the estate of said decedent, real and personal, to which he became entitled by virtue of and as provided for him in the Last Will and Testament of said decedent dated April 11, 1938.' Objection to the allowance of each of the claims was filed. Judgment was entered on July 23, 1951, as follows:
'It is Adjudged and Decreed:
'1. That the joint will of George Schefe and Anna Schefe, his wife, dated April 11, 1938 was irrevocable only as to any property owned by the said George Schefe and Anna Schefe at the time of the death of Anna Schefe on October 31, 1940.
'2. That the agreement dated April 11, 1938 signed by George Schefe and Anna Schefe related only to property that they both owned at the time of the death of the first of them, namely, as of October 31st, 1940.
'3. That the beneficiaries mentioned in the joint will and agreement both dated April 11th, 1938 between George Schefe and Anna Schefe had a vested interest upon the death of Anna Schefe on October 31st, 1940 in the property mentioned in said joint will and agreement, subject only to being divested by the survivor of said George Schefe and Anna Schefe during his or her lifetime.
'4. That upon the death of Irma Schefe on February 7, 1949, her interest in the estate of George Schefe and Anna Schefe went to her heirs-at-law free and clear of any and all claims of any of the beneficiaries under the joint will of George Schefe and Anna Schefe.
'5. That George Schefe, as the father and sole heir-at-law of Irma Schefe, inherited the said Irma Schefe's interest under the joint will of George Schefe and Anna Schefe.
'6. That George Schefe had a right to dispose of all property and estate which he received and inherited from the estate of Irma Schefe, including any interest of the said Irma Schefe under the joint will of George Schefe and Anna Schefe.
'7. That the legacy of $1,000.00 under the joint will of George Schefe and Anna Schefe bequeathed to Irma Schefe did not lapse and was not divested by George Schefe during his lifetime.
The claimants appeal.
Benton, Bosser, Becker, Parnell & Fulton, Appleton, Williams, Williams & Meyer, Oshkosh, for Eugene G. Williams, guardian ad litem for Florence Schefe.
O'Leary, Joyce & Remley, and Cooke & Loehning, Neenah, for Gaylord C. Loehning, guardian ad litem for minors.
Do the provisions of the joint will and the agreement apply to the property acquired by the husband after the death of the wife?
While we may not overlook nor agnore the terms of the will in considering the question, the important instrument is the agreement; it is essentially the terms of the latter which control. The rights and obligations of the parties are determined by its terms. Indeed, it has been held that despite the contract the will may be revoked or modified, but if it is equity will interpose and permit specific enforcement of the agreement and prevent the perpetration of fraud which would result from its breach.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Estate of Kerr
...v. Murdock, 147 Neb. 242, 22 N.W.2d 713, 718 (1946); Damron v. Mast, 121 N.J.Eq. 489, 191 A. 467, 470 (1937); In re Schefe's Estate, 261 Wis. 113, 52 N.W.2d 375, 379 (1952). 16 Compare Evans v. Ockershausen, 69 App.D.C. 285, 292, 100 F.2d 695, 702, 128 A.L.R. 177 (1938); George Washington U......
-
Uihlein's Will, In re
... ... and all of an interlocutory judgment entered September 22, 1952, in the county court of Milwaukee county, entitled 'Order Determining Federal Estate Taxes Not to be Deducted from Widow's Share under sec. 233.14 Wis.Stats. and Construing Will' ... George Uihlein, a resident of ... ...
- Farber's Estate, In re, 39
-
Sipple v. Zimmerman
...159 N.W.2d 706 ... 39 Wis.2d 481 ... Aurora SIPPLE, Appellant, ... R. E. ZIMMERMAN, Special Admr. of the Estate of Lena Kraft, ... Respondent ... Supreme Court of Wisconsin ... June 28, 1968 ... Doar, Drill & Norman, New Richmond, for ... ...