Schlicke v. Allen-Bradley Co.
Decision Date | 17 April 1978 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 76-C-717. |
Parties | Heinz M. SCHLICKE, Plaintiff, v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Howard N. Myers, Richard D. Hicks, Robert G. Dowling, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.
Laurence E. Gooding, Jr., George K. Whyte, Jr., Patrick W. Schmidt, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.
DECISION AND ORDER
This action arises under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The plaintiff Heinz M. Schlicke alleges that he was discriminated against in the terms and conditions of his employment and that he was terminated from employment with the defendant Allen-Bradley Company because of his age in violation of the ADEA. He sets forth two claims, the first seeking damages representing lost compensation, reduced pension and other benefits, and liquidated damages, and the second seeking damages for harm to the plaintiff's professional reputation. The defendant has moved to strike the second claim of the complaint on the ground that the ADEA does not contemplate recovery for injury to professional reputation. For the reasons hereafter stated, the motion will be granted.
Section 626(b) of 29 U.S.C. provides:
* * *."
Section 626(c) of 29 U.S.C. provides in part:
"Any person aggrieved may bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction for such legal or equitable relief as will effectuate the purposes of this chapter: * * *."
The plaintiff argues that by its use of the language "such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this chapter, * * * without limitation," Congress intended to permit the recovery of damages for intangible injuries, such as injuries to reputation, and did not intend to limit the types of recovery to those set forth in 29 U.S.C. § 626(b), i. e., to equitable relief such as employment, promotion, and reinstatement, and also damages for unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation.
However, the ADEA creates a remedy for the injury of discrimination on the basis of age, which was not compensable at common law. Therefore the Court...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Douglas v. American Cyanamid Co.
...Corp., 424 F.Supp. 1329, 1335-38 (E.D.Pa.1976); Sant v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 424 F.Supp. 621 (N.D. Cal.1976). Cf. Schlicke v. Allen-Bradley Co., 448 F.Supp. 252 (E.D.Wis.1978) and Dorsey v. Consolidated Broadcasting Corp., 432 F.Supp. 542 (E.D.Wis.1977) (plaintiff under ADEA not entitled to d......
-
Pfeiffer v. Essex Wire Corp.
...give individuals the ability to take advantage of the relief conferred in § 626(b), the preceding subsection. Schlicke v. Allen-Bradley Co., 448 F.Supp. 252, 253 (E.D.Wis.1978). ...