Schmidt v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.
Decision Date | 21 November 1932 |
Parties | BLANCHE D. SCHMIDT, APPELLANT, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO., ETC., RESPONDENT |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Pettis County.--Hon. Dimmitt Hoffman Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Judgment affirmed.
Crawford & Harlan for appellant.
Morrison Nugent, Wylder & Berger for respondent.
This is an action to recover upon a certificate of life insurance issued upon and under the provisions of a certain group policy.
Defendant is an insurance corporation organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut, having its home office at Hartford in said State, and duly authorized to do business in the State of Missouri. The record discloses that on November 14, 1927, defendant issued and delivered to E. M. Milton & Sons and affiliated companies of Sedalia, Missouri, a group policy of insurance, for the benefit of certain of their employees who would accept the benefits thereof by agreement with said employer, among whom was John Schmidt. Under and by virtue of said group policy, a certificate No. 89, was issued by said employer to said John Schmidt, on November 14, 1927, insuring his life for the sum of $ 1,000, and naming his wife, Blanche D. Schmidt, plaintiff herein, as beneficiary. Under the terms of said insurance, part of the premium was deducted by the employer from the pay of the employee, and the remainder of the premium was paid by the employer who remitted the total premium to the insurer.
On or about the last day of May, 1929, the said John Schmidt left the employ of said E. H. Milton & Sons, his insurance being paid up to June 14, 1929. On June 30, 1929, John Schmidt died from a hemorrhage sustained during an operation on his tonsils. Thereafter the plaintiff herein, wife and beneficiary named in the certificate, made claim for $ 1,000, claimed to be due under the certificate of insurance, but defendant company refused payment on the ground the employer had notified defendant that said insured had voluntarily left their employ on the last day of May, 1929, and the employer asked insurer to cancel the insurance as to said John Schmidt, said written request being dated June 15, 1929. The insurance was cancelled, but John Schmidt was never notified of the request nor of the cancellation.
Payment being refused, this suit was instituted by plaintiff, who alleged in her petition the issuance of said insurance, the death of the insured, that she was the beneficiary, and asked judgment against defendant in the sum of $ 1,000, the amount of the policy, ten per cent thereof for vexatious delay and $ 250 attorney's fee.
The answer was, first, a general denial, and for affirmative defense, it was alleged said insured left the employment of the Milton Oil Company on or about June 1, 1929, and that the certificate of insurance referred to in plaintiff's first amended petition, as having been issued to the said John Schmidt by the Milton Oil Company, was at the express direction of said oil company cancelled on or about the 13th day of June, 1929, and that no premium was paid by, or on behalf of said insured beyond the period ending June 14, 1929, after which time said certificate and said master policy of insurance, in so far as the same, at any time, had related to plaintiff, were of no force or effect.
The reply was a general denial.
Thereupon the parties entered into a stipulation, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial