Schmidt v. Ramsey County
Decision Date | 03 August 1992 |
Docket Number | No. 920018CA,920018CA |
Parties | 7 IER Cases 1139 Jan Thompson SCHMIDT, f/k/a Jan Thompson, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RAMSEY COUNTY and Vicki Haman, individually, and in her official capacity as Clerk of Ramsey County District Court, Defendants and Appellees. Civ. |
Court | North Dakota Court of Appeals |
James F. Lester (argued), Fargo, for plaintiff and appellant.
Lucas and Smith, Bismarck, for defendants and appellees, argued by Randall J. Bakke.
Jan Schmidt appealed from a summary judgment dismissing her action for wrongful termination of employment. We reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.
Jan was employed as the Deputy Clerk of the District Court of Ramsey County in June 1984. The Clerk of the District Court, Vicki Haman, was Jan's immediate supervisor. On December 29, 1986, Vicki fired Jan. Jan appealed her termination to the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners (the Commissioners). Following a hearing, the Ramsey County State's Attorney by letter dated February 6, 1987, notified Jan that "your termination of 12-29-86 is hereby reversed and you are directed to report back to work upon receipt of this letter." Jan responded by letter, rejecting her reinstatement:
No party has argued on appeal that the Commissioners' decision constituted a reversal of Jan's termination. All parties treat Jan's termination as complete and final, and we will not, therefore, question her status as a terminated employee.
In bringing her action for damages, Jan asserts that: (1) she has been deprived of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Federal Constitution, entitling her to damages and attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1988; (2) her contractual employment rights under the Ramsey County Personnel Policy employee handbook have been breached; and that (3) the defendants have violated public policy by failing to comply with the county's written personnel policies.
In dismissing Jan's action, the district court, citing Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n, 407 N.W.2d 206, 211 (N.D.1987), concluded as a matter of law that Jan was an at-will employee, without contractual employment rights, who could be terminated with or without cause, and that Jan had, therefore, failed to state an actionable claim or raise a genuine issue of fact. We believe that issues raised by Jan are beyond the issues raised and disposed of by the law pronounced in Hillesland, supra.
Summary judgment should be granted under Rule 56, N.D.R.Civ.P., only if, after taking the view of the evidence most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment is sought, it appears that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Binstock v. Tschider, 374 N.W.2d 81 (N.D.1985). When an employee is hired for an indefinite term in North Dakota, the employment is presumed to be at-will. Section 34-03-01, N.D.C.C. 1 Bailey v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc., 398 N.W.2d 120 (N.D.1986). However, when an employer promulgates a manual of personnel policies, the entire manual will be examined to determine whether it discloses an intent to overcome the presumption in Section 34-03-01, N.D.C.C. See Eldridge v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, 417 N.W.2d 797 (N.D.1987). The employer must be held accountable under those policies in its employment relationships, and the provisions in the manual provide the standard by which an employee's termination must be reviewed. Hammond v. North Dakota State Personnel Board, 345 N.W.2d 359 (N.D.1984). Eldridge, supra, 417 N.W.2d at 799 states that, "by his or her unilateral objective manifestation of intent, the employer creates an expectation, and thus an obligation of treatment in accord with those written promises." See also Bailey, supra; Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Co., 102 Wash.2d 219, 230-231, 685 P.2d 1081, 1088 (1984); Restatement (Second) of Contract, Sec. 2 (1981). A clearly stated disclaimer in an employee personnel manual, stating that the policies in it are not intended to create contractual rights, may be a factor in determining whether an employee enjoys only an at-will employment status. 2
Jan was given a copy of the Ramsey County Personnel Policy handbook by Vicki shortly after she was employed as the Deputy Clerk of the District Court. Later Jan was given her own copy of the handbook. Jan asserts that the handbook gave her express contractual employment rights and that she relied on them. The manual does not contain an explicit disclaimer about not creating enforceable contract rights. It does contain several provisions which are relevant to Jan's action for wrongful termination:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jose v. Norwest Bank North Dakota, NA
...be only a guide for the employee. Olson v. Souris River Telecommunications, 1997 ND 10, ¶ 13, 558 N.W.2d 333; Schmidt v. Ramsey County, 488 N.W.2d 411, 413 (N.D.Ct.App.1992). If the intention of the parties can be ascertained from the terms of the personnel manual alone, its interpretation ......
-
Rykowsky v. Dickinson Public School Dist. No. 1
...be examined to determine whether it discloses an intent to overcome the presumption in Section 34-03-01, N.D.C.C." Schmidt v. Ramsey County, 488 N.W.2d 411, 413 (N.D.App.1992). Rykowsky contends that he was not a "classified" employee, terminable at will. He contends that if he were a class......
-
Osterman-Levitt v. MedQuest, Inc., OSTERMAN-LEVIT
...whether it discloses an intent to overcome the presumption in Section 34-03-01, N.D.C.C.' " Rykowsky [quoting Schmidt v. Ramsey County, 488 N.W.2d 411, 413 (N.D.Ct.App.1992) ]. Promises, express or implied, in personnel policies with respect to job security and termination procedures must b......
-
Olson v. Souris River Telecommunications Co-op., Inc., 960144
...language in the manual creates an intent to overcome the at will presumption and create an employment contract. Schmidt v. Ramsey County, 488 N.W.2d 411, 413 (N.D.Ct.App.1992) (citing Eldridge v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, 417 N.W.2d 797, 799 (N.D.1987)). Therefore, we exa......