Schmikler v. Petersime Incubator Co., Civil Action No. 6359.

Citation77 F. Supp. 11
Decision Date08 April 1948
Docket NumberCivil Action No. 6359.
PartiesSCHMIKLER v. PETERSIME INCUBATOR CO.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

Morris Michelson and Morris D. Slovin, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Joseph N. Welch and Hale & Dorr, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

HEALEY, District Judge.

This matter came on for hearing on the defendant's motions to dismiss the plaintiff's action. The grounds stated in one of the motions is as follows:

"1. The Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter because the amount of damages, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed the sum of three thousand dollars ($3,000).

"2. The Court lacks jurisdiction over the person because the defendant is not a citizen of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and is not engaged in carrying on a business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

"3. There was an insufficiency of service of process in that the summons and complaint were delivered to one Austin Callander, and said Austin Callander did not have sufficient authority to represent the defendant so as to make service of process upon him service of process upon the defendant."

The other motion is identical, except that the name of Lester J. Bangs, defendant's eastern representative, is substituted for that of Austin Callander.

At the hearing, counsel for the defendant waived its allegations as to the lack of the jurisdictional amount, for the purposes of this hearing only, and without prejudice to renew it if this motion to dismiss is denied. This court will, therefore, confine itself to a consideration of only the grounds numbered "2" and "3" above.

Findings of Fact.

1. The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Whitman, Massachusetts.

2. The defendant is a corporation duly organized under the laws of Ohio, with its usual place of business in Gettysburg, Ohio.

3. On January 16, 1947, plaintiff filed this complaint in this action, seeking to recover damages allegedly sustained by him as a result of a breach of a warranty made by the defendant that an incubator sold by the defendant to the plaintiff was fit for the purpose for which the plaintiff intended to use it, and that said incubator was in good condition and had no defective parts.

4. On January 17, 1947, a deputy United States marshal attempted to serve a copy of the summons issued in this action, together with a copy of the complaint, on the defendant, by giving in hand to one Austin Callander, representative of the defendant at the Boston Poultry Show, Boston Garden, North Station, Boston.

5. On January 23, 1948, a deputy United States marshal served a copy of the summons issued in this action, together with a copy of the complaint, on the defendant by giving in hand to Lester Banks, agent in charge of its business at Mechanics Building, Huntington Avenue, Boston.

6. The defendant manufactures incubators and parts for incubators in its factory in Gettysburg, Ohio. These incubators are sold throughout the United States. The defendant has no factory, warehouse, office or store in Massachusetts. Its name is not displayed on any place of business in Massachusetts, nor is it to be found in any telephone directory in this state.

7. Austin Callander was employed by the defendant to sell and service incubators in the New England states. His home is in Bridgewater, Massachusetts. He is employed by the defendant on a straight commission basis on sales. He owns his own car, and pays for its expense himself without reimbursement by the defendant, unless he is directed by the defendant to perform some special work for it. His name and picture have appeared in advertisements of Petersime Incubators in certain poultry publications, but he does not display the Petersime name on any sign at his home, from which he operates. He keeps various replacement parts for Petersime incubators in his home. Those parts are owned by Callander, being purchased from the defendant. If he replaces a part in an incubator while servicing it for the defendant, the defendant reimburses him by supplying him with another part. Callander performs only light service, all heavy service is done by workmen sent from defendant's plant in Gettysburg, Ohio.

8. Orders for Petersime incubators are taken by Callander in the following manner: The purchaser signs in triplicate a contract setting forth the type of incubator desired and its price. Among the clauses of the contracts are the following:

"It is agreed that the title and right to possession of the herein described property shall remain in Petersime Incubator Co., until the entire purchase price has been paid, together with interest as provided whereon title and ownership shall be vested in the purchaser * * *."

"It is agreed that purchaser keep incubator in good condition and in its original construction, not permitting service on same other than Petersime representatives; * * *."

After the contract was signed, the purchaser retained one copy and two copies were transmitted to the defendant. If the defendant's president approved of the terms, etc., he would sign the contract. No sale was final unless it was approved by the defendant's president at the factory. If the president approved of the contract, the original, signed by both parties, would be recorded in the clerk's office of the city or town where the purchaser lives. The other copy went to the files of the defendant, where it was kept under the purchaser's name until the payments were completed.

9. All time payments were made by the purchaser directly to the defendant in Ohio.

10. Callander on making some sales, took in trade secondhand incubators as a down payment on the purchase price.

11. Callander, during much of the time he has been employed by the defendant, has also done other work, although at the time he was served, his sole employment was with the defendant.

12. When a sale was completed, the incubator would be shipped to Massachusetts by freight and installed by Callander, or, in the case of large incubators, they would be shipped by truck and installed by employees of the defendant who came here with the truck.

13. Lester J. Bangs was in charge of sales and service for the defendant in their eastern territory. He was paid a weekly salary and expenses. He comes to Massachusetts from one to six times a year — one of which occasions is to be at the poultry show. He attended the poultry show to meet customers, demonstrate incubators and to make sales.

14. At their exhibits at the poultry show, the defendant pays for the exhibition space, provides for the erection of a suitable booth and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Taylor v. Klenzade Products, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1952
    ...Hampshire, it follows on this record that Stonoga was the agent 'having charge' of the defendant's business here. Schmikler v. Petersime Incubator Co., D.C., 77 F.Supp. 11, 14; Id., 1 Cir., 177 F.2d 983, supra; Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, supra, 165 F.2d 37. He was clearly the defendant's a......
  • Radio Shack Corp. v. Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • March 31, 1960
    ...of distributions made in Massachusetts by the Massachusetts corporation. Seifert is the general manager of the business of the Massachusetts corporation at 110 Federal St., Boston. There is not resident in Massachusetts any supervisory authority of higher authority in the hierarchy of the M......
  • SCHMIKLER v. Petersime Incubator Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • March 16, 1949
    ...has asked the Court to review the decision of Judge Healey which denied a motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. D.C., 77 F.Supp. 11. This request is based upon two recent decisions of the Court of Appeals of this Circuit, Pulson et al. v. American Rolling Mill Co., 1 Cir., ......
  • Currant v. Eastern SS Lines, Civ. A. No. 6747.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • April 13, 1948
    ... ...        The plaintiff instituted this action in the state court, seeking damages for injuries ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT