Schmitt v. LaRose

Docket Number19-3196
Decision Date07 August 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
52 cases
  • VoteAmerica v. Schwab
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • November 19, 2021
    ... ... v. White , 536 U.S. 765, 774–75, 122 S.Ct. 2528, 153 L.Ed.2d 694 (2002) ); Schmitt v. LaRose , 933 F.3d 628, 639 (6th Cir. 2019) ("The first, most critical step is to consider the severity of the restriction" and if law imposes ... ...
  • Project Veritas v. Ohio Election Comm'n
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • November 20, 2019
    ... ... 2016) (applying strict scrutiny to facial challenge of Ohio false statement laws as content-based restrictions); Schmitt v. LaRose , 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019) (holding ballot-initiative process not a prior restraint in facial challenge to statute under First ... ...
  • Mazo v. New Jersey Secretary of State
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • November 23, 2022
    ... ... 2020) ; Lemons v. Bradbury , 538 F.3d 1098, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2008) ; Kendall v. Balcerzak , 650 F.3d 515, 525, 528 (4th Cir. 2011) ; Schmitt v. LaRose , 933 F.3d 628, 639-42 (6th Cir. 2019) ; Campbell v. Buckley , 203 F.3d 738, 741, 743-45 (10th Cir. 2000). 18 See, e.g., Hobbs , ... ...
  • Tenn. State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P. v. Hargett
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • September 13, 2019
    ... ... The Sixth Circuit's recent opinion in Schmitt v. LaRose , 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019), provides a useful framework for distinguishing between cases in which Anderson - Burdick is ... ...
  • Get Started for Free