Schneider v. Am. Indem. Co.

• Decision Date: 08 December 1942
• Citation: 6 N.W.2d 644,241 Wis. 568
• Parties: SCHNEIDER v. AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO.
• Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court

241 Wis. 568

6 N.W.2d 644

SCHNEIDER

v.AMERICAN INDEMNITY CO.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Dec. 8, 1942.

Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Waukesha County; Edward J. Gehl, Judge.

Affirmed.

Action by Joseph Schneider as plaintiff against American Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation, defendant, commenced on March 9, 1941, to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff while a guest in the automobile of one Clement Mueller, insured by defendant. The action was tried to the court and jury and a special verdict rendered. The jury found that Mueller was negligent in respect of control and management, and the distance with which he followed a vehicle immediately ahead of him. Plaintiff was found negligent in respect of the position he assumed in the automobile. The jury found that plaintiff did not assume the risk of injury involved in the manner in which Mueller operated his automobile. Eighty per cent of the negligence was attributed to Mueller and twenty per cent to plaintiff. The damages were assessed at $1087.50. Upon motions after verdict the trial court set aside the jury's determination as to assumption of risk and ordered judgment for defendant. Judgment was entered accordingly on March 12, 1942. Plaintiff appeals. The material facts will be stated in the opinion.

Gene Posner, of Milwaukee (Lockney, Lowry & Hunter, of Waukesha, of counsel), for appellant.

Bendinger, Hayes, Kluwin & Schlosser, of Milwaukee, for respondent.

WICKHEM, Justice.

Plaintiff's sole contention is that the trial court erred in changing the jury's answer on assumption of risk from “no” to “yes”. Consideration of this contention requires a statement of the facts.

On August 2, 1940, plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile driven by Clement Mueller, the insured. Plaintiff and one George Sell occupied the rear seat of the automobile, Mueller being alone in the driver's seat. Prior to the accident, the car was proceeding in a southeasterly direction on highway 41 from Slinger, Wisconsin, to Milwaukee. Throughout the trip. Mueller was traveling at about fifty miles per hour in heavy traffic, and was maintaining a distance of about fifty to one hundred feet from the car ahead of him. Just before the accident the second car ahead of Mueller pulled off the roadway and caused the car immediately ahead of him to make a sudden stop. Mueller made an abrupt stop and succeeded in avoiding a collision. Shortly before this, however, plaintiff and Sell had stood up in the rear of the Mueller car, faced the rear, and proceeded to adjust the rear seat which was out of its socket. Sell had just turned around to sit down and plaintiff was still facing to the rear when Mueller made his sudden stop. Sell was thrown on top of Mueller and plaintiff was thrown backwards into the front compartment of the car. Under these circumstances, plaintiff claims that there is credible evidence to sustain the jury's findings that plaintiff did not assume the risk of injury involved in the manner in which Mueller operated his automobile. It is plaintiff's contention that the sudden application of the brakes was a momentary matter which plaintiff could not assume.

Defendant contends that this case is governed by the principle of Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co., 212 Wis. 403, 249 N.W. 278, in that plaintiff had acquiesced in the rate of speed and the distance at which Mueller was following the car ahead of him; that if this speed and the distance maintained precipitated a situation in which Mueller had to...