Schneider v. State

Decision Date15 December 1971
Docket NumberNo. 50008,50008
CitationSchneider v. State, 327 N.Y.S.2d 60, 38 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
PartiesClarence L. SCHNEIDER, Respondent, v. STATE of New York, Appellant. Claim
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Kevin Seits and Albert A. Sloane, New York City (Arnold J. Kaplan, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. (Dennis Hurley, Albany, of counsel), for appellant.

Before HERLIHY, P.J., and REYNOLDS, STALEY, GREENBLOTT and COOKE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal by the State from a judgment of the Court of Claims, 64 Misc.2d 803, 316 N.Y.S.2d 155, holding the State liable for negligence and awarding claimant $6150 damages.

Claimant, a dentist, operated his New York City office from April of 1967 to February 28, 1968 in premises appropriated by the State of New York. On the instant record the evidence is clearly inadequate to support the award of damages made by the trial court. Damages cannot be awarded on the basis of conjecture and guesswork (e.g., Steitz v. Gifford, 280 N.Y. 15, 19 N.E.2d 661), and, accordingly, the judgment must be reversed and the claim dismissed.

Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and claim dismissed, without costs.

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Kenford Co., Inc. v. Erie County
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 12, 1985
    ...the basis of conjecture and guesswork (Schanbarger v. Edward Dott's Garage, 72 A.D.2d 882, 883, 421 N.Y.S.2d 937; Schneider v. State of New York, 38 A.D.2d 628, 327 N.Y.S.2d 60). Damages that are uncertain contingent, or speculative may not be recovered (Broadway Photoplay Co. v. World Film......
  • Stuart-Bullock v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 15, 1971
  • Robert T. Donaldson, Inc. v. Aggregate Surfacing Corp. of America
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 31, 1975
    ...little more than guesswork (see Broadway Photoplay Co. v. World Film Corp., 225 N.Y. 104, 109, 121 N.E. 756, 758; Schneider v. State of New York, 38 A.D.2d 628, 327 N.Y.S.2d 60). The trial court's instructions permitted the jury to find damages for loss of goodwill, injury to reputation and......
  • Roundtree v. Singh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 31, 1988
    ...v. Dott's Garage, 72 A.D.2d 882, 421 N.Y.S.2d 937, lv. denied 49 N.Y.2d 701, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 403 N.E.2d 187; Schneider v. State of New York, 38 A.D.2d 628, 327 N.Y.S.2d 60). Therefore, the trial court properly dismissed the plaintiff's cause of action for loss of We agree with Presiding ......
  • Get Started for Free