Schrader v. Mills
Decision Date | 12 September 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 16261.,16261. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | SCHRADER. v. MONARCH MILLS et al. |
The Industrial Commission made an award to Paul Schrader for an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment which resulted in serious disability and disfigurement by reason of employee having been bitten by a black widow spider and the Monarch Mills, employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, insurance carrier, appealed.
The Common Pleas Court, Union County, T. B. Greneker, J., affirmed the award and the employer and insurance carrier appealed.
The Supreme Court, Taylor, J., held that evidence was sufficient to sustain the Commission's finding that claimant received an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment and affirmed the order of the court.
Osborne, Butler & Moore, Spartanburg, for appellants.
J. Fred McLure and John D. Long, both of Union, for respondent.
The respondent, Paul Schrader, contends that on April 27, 1947, while employed by the appellant, Monarch Mills, he suffered an injury, which arose out of and in the course of his employment, by reason of being bitten by a black widow spider, and that this injury resulted in serious disability and disfigurement.
Claim was duly filed with the South Carolina Industrial Commission, and a hearing held thereon resulted in an opinion and award in favor of claimant, dated December 23, 1947. Appellants made application for a review by the entire Commission, which, in a majority opinion, adopted the opinion and award of the Hearing Commissioner. In due course, appellants appealed to the Court of Common Pleas for Union County, the matter being heard by the Honorable T. B. Greneker, who filed an order dated February 4, 1949, overruling all exceptions, and appellants now come to this Court upon exceptions which raise the one question of whether or not there was evidence from which a reasonable inference could be drawn that respondent's injuries arose out of his employment.
An injury arises in the course of employment within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act, Code 1942, § 7035-1 et seq., when it occurs within the period of the employment at a place where the employee reasonably may be in the performance of his duties and while he is fulfilling those duties or engaged in doing something incidental thereto. An accident arises out of the employment when it arises because of it, as when the employment is a contributing proximate cause. These conditions must concur before the act can apply. Johnson v. Merchant's Fertilizer Co. et al., 198 S.C. 373, 17 S.E.2d 695.
Claimant testified that on the date in question he was employed by the Monarch Mills Co. at their Lockhart plant, and a portion of his testimony appears as follows:
up there.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sharpe v. Case Produce Co.
... ... See also Smith v. Union Bleachery/Cone Mills, 276 S.C. 454, 456, 280 S.E.2d 52, 53 (1981) (quoting S.C.Code Ann. § 1-23-380(g)(4) (Supp.1980)) (court may reverse or modify agency's decision " ... Fowler v. Abbott Motor Co., 236 S.C. 226, 113 S.E.2d 737 (1960); Schrader v. Monarch Mills, 215 S.C. 357, 55 S.E.2d 285 (1949) ... D. Question of Law ... Under Workers' Compensation law, the decision of ... ...
-
Hiers v. Brunson Const. Co.
...v. Carolina Light & Power Co., 215 S.C. 25, 53 S.E.2d 872; Buff v. Columbia Baking Co., 215 S.C. 41, 53 S.E.2d 879; Schrader v. Monarch Mills, 215 S.C. 357, 55 S.E.2d 285; Teigue v. Appleton Company, S.C., 68 S.E.2d Mrs. Hiers, the respondent herein, testified that the deceased was working ......
-
Nicholson v. S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs.
...injury arose out of employment where claimant was injured after another employee engaged him in horseplay); Schrader v. Monarch Mills, 215 S.C. 357, 359, 55 S.E.2d 285, 286 (1949) (affirming finding that claimant's injuries arose out of his employment where claimant was bitten by a black wi......
-
Fowler v. Abbott Motor Co.
...it, as when the employment is a contributing proximate cause. These conditions must concur before the Act can apply. Schrader v. Monarch Mills, 215 S.C. 357, 55 S.E.2d 285, and Portee v. S. C. State Hospital, 234 S.C. 50, 106 S.E.2d We have no difficulty in concluding that the respondent su......