Schreibers v. Drossness
Decision Date | 31 January 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 74.,74. |
Parties | Auguste SCHREIBER et al, Respondents v. Nathan DROSSNESS et al., Appellant. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from a Decree of the Court of Chancery.
Albert H. Holland, of Morristown, for appellants.
King & Vogt, of Morristown, for respondents.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice Chancellor Fielder, 136 A. 515.
For affirmance. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH. CAMPBELL, and LLOYD and Judges VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, and HETFIELD.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weinstein v. Swartz
...for private dwellings. Sanford v. Keer, 80 N.J.Eq. 240, 245, 83 A. 225, 40 L.R.A., N.S., 1090 (E. & A. 1912); Schreiber v. Drosness, 100 N.J.Eq. 591, 594, 135 A. 920, 136 A. 515 (E. & A. 1926); Wickwire v. Church, 142 N.J.Eq. 174, 59 A.2d 416 (Ch.1948), affirmed 1 N.J. 384, 64 A.2d 55 (1949......
-
La Fetra v. Beveridge
...Sanford v. Keer, 80 N.J.Eq. 240, 83 A. 225, 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 1090; Morrow v. Hasselman, 69 N.J.Eq. 612, 61 A. 369; Schreiber v. Drosness, 100 N.J.Eq. 591, 135 A. 920, 136 A. "At the time this tract was laid out there was a high bluff of sand dunes along the ocean front, beyond which was the ......
-
Friedman v. Cicoria
...rights. Bridgewater v. Ocean City R. R. Co., 62 N.J.Eq. 276, 292, 49 A. 801,affirmed63 N.J.Eq. 798, 52 A. 1130; Schreiber v. Drosness, 100 N.J.Eq. 591, 596, 135 A. 920, 136 A. 515. PER CURIAM. The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reason stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Fiel......
-
Humphreys v. Ibach
...with the design of the original grantor. Sanford v. Keer, 80 N. J. Eq. 240, 83 A. 225, 40 L. R, A. (N. S.) 1090; Schreiber v. Drosness, 100 N. J. Eq. 591, 135 A. 920, 136 A. 515. No evidence has been presented to show that it was unreasonable to require a 75-foot setback for garages on West......