Schreyer v. Platt
Decision Date | 24 March 1890 |
Parties | SCHREYER v. PLATT. 1 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
F. R. Coudert, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 406-407 intentionally omitted] T. Mitchell Tying, for appellee.
The question in this case is whether certain transfers of property made by John Schreyer to his wife, Anna Maria Schreyer, were fraudulent and void as against Peter J. Vanderbilt, a creditor of John Schreyer. The case is here on appeal from a decree of the circuit court for the southern district of New York, brought by the assignee in bankruptcy of Schreyer against Schreyer individually, and as executor, etc., of his wife, now deceased. The circuit court (25 Fed. Rep. 83) found that the transfers were fraudulent, and decreed that the bankrupt, as executor and trustee, convey the real estate and bonds and mortgages hereafter described to the assignee in bankruptcy. From such decree this appeal has been taken. The facts are these: On Janaury 21, 1871, Schreyer conveyed to his wife the following real estate situated in the city of New York: Nos. 348 and 350 West Thirty-Ninth street, and Nos. 351, 353, and 355 West Forty-Second street. The title was passed from Schreyer to his wife by conveyance to Edward Sharkey, and from him to Mrs. Schreyer. On October 15, 1870, Schreyer and his wife conveyed No. 420 West Fortieth street to George Gebhart and No. 422 West Fortieth street to Matthew L. Ritchie, who each thereupon executed mortgages for $5,000 to Mrs. Schreyer. These conveyances and mortgages were all recorded in 1871. Notice was thus given by public record of title in Mrs. Schreyer to both the real estate and the mortgages. Thereafter, and in 1874, buildings were erected on the twolots last mentioned, the mortgages for $5,000 surrendered, and two new mortgages taken,—one from Gebhart to Mrs. Schreyer for $7,750 on premises No. 420 West Fortieth street, and one from Ritchie to Mrs. Schreyer for $8,850 on premises No. 422 West Fortieth street. The claim of Vanderbilt arose in this way: On February 2, 1874, a building contract was entered into between George Gebhart and Matthew L. Ritchie, as owners of premises Nos. 420 and 422 West Fortieth street, with Vanderbilt, whereby he covenanted to erect two buildings on said premises for the sum of $8,175, to be paid in the following manner: 'When the said houses are topped out, the payment of five thousand ($5,000) dollars, by assignment of mortgage held by John Schreyer on the property of Anna Maria Schreyer, No. 350 West 42d street, in the city of New York; three thousand one hundred and seventy-five ($3,175) dollars when the houses are fully completed as above.' On May 5, 1874, Vanderbilt had so far completed his contract that he was entitled to an assignment of the bond and mortgage. He then demanded and received from Schreyer, not only an assignment, but a guaranty, of the bond and mortgage. There was no new consideration for this guaranty. In 1876 a prior mortgage on the premises covered by the bond and mortgage assigned as above set forth was foreclosed, and swept away the entire property, so that this bond and mortgage became worthless; whereupon Schreyer was sued on his guaranty, and judgment recovered thereon. On September 17, 1878, John Schreyer was adjudged a bankrupt upon a creditor's petition filed August 23, 1878. Several claims were proved against his estate in bankruptcy, but all have been satisfied except that of Vanderbilt; so that, while this action was brought by an assignee in bankruptcy, it was really for the sole benefit of Vanderbilt. On September 6, 1876, Mrs. Schreyer died, leaving a will be which her property was devised and bequeathed to her children. Her husband was named § executor; and he, individually and as executor was the defendant in this suit.
And now the contention of the plaintiff below is that the conveyances of January 21, 1871, and the two mortgages from Gebhart and Ritchie to Mrs. Schreyer in 1874, were fraudulent and void as against the claim of Vanderbilt. The conveyances were made and recorded more than three years prior to the building contract out of which Vanderbilt's claim arose; and, while the mortgages to Mrs. Schreyer were executed and recorded during the same year with the building contract, yet the obligation assumed by Schreyer was a voluntary one, without consideration, and after a contract expressly providing for payment in another way, was conditional, and only became a fixed indebtedness two years thereafter, when by the foreclosure proceedings the worthlessness of the guarantied bond and mortgage was developed. Obviously, very clear and direct testimony is essential to support an adjudication that these various transfers were fraudulent and void as against this subsequent creditor. In determining the rules applicable to such transactions, reference should be had, not only to the decisions of this court, but also to those of the courts of New York, where the parties lived, and the transactions took place. Allen v. Massey, 17 Wall. 351; Graham v. Railroad Co., 102 U. S. 148; Wallace v. Penfield, 106 U. S. 260, 263, 264, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 216.
In a recent case in the court of appeals of New York, Todd v. Nelson, 109 N. Y. 316, 327, 16 N. E. Rep. 360, that court thus stated the law: See, also, Phillips v. Wooster, 36 N. Y. 412; Curtis v. Fox, 47 N. Y. 299; Dunlap v. Hawkins, 59 N. y. 342; Carr v. Breese, 81 N. Y. 584; and Bank v. Stafford, 89 N. Y. 405. Turning now to the cases in this court: It was said in Smith v. Vodges, 92 U. S. 183: .' In Graham v. Railroad Co., 102 U. S. 148, 154, it was said: In Wallace v. Penfield, 106 U. S. 260, 262, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 216, in which it appeared that the husband transferring property to his wife was indebted at the time of the transfer, though not to the party complaining of the transaction, the court observed: And in Horbach v. Hill, 112 U. S. 144, 149, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 81, this language was used: From these authorities, it is evident that the rule obtaining in New York, as well as recognized by this court, is that even a voluntary conveyance from husband to wife is good as against subsequent creditors unless it was made with the intent to defraud such subsequent creditors; or there was secrecy in the transaction by which knowledge of it was withheld from such creditors, who dealt with the grantor upon the faith of his owning the property transferred; or the transfer was made with a view of entering into some new and hazardous business, the risk of which the grantor intended should be cast upon the parties having dealings with him in the new business. Tested by these rules, it is impossible to sustain an adjudication,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coleman v. Hagey
...Siegel, 212 Ill. 617; Smith v. Gaylord, 47 Conn. 380; Eckhart v. Mfg. Co., 236 Ill. 134; Lawrence v. Greenup, 38 C. C. A. 549; Schreyer v. Scott, 134 U.S. 405. (3) real estate and assets in question was not "capital stock;" it was assets of the corporation. When withdrawn the corporation wa......
-
Hall & Farley v. Alabama Terminal & Improvement Co.
... ... McLarney, 97 Ala. 388, 12 So. 398; Rollins v. Shaver ... Wagon Co., 80 Iowa, 380, 45 N.W. 1037, 20 Am. St. Rep ... 434; Schreyer v. Scott, 134 U.S. 405, 10 S.Ct. 579, ... 33 L.Ed. 955; 2 Morawetz on Corp. §§ 795, 800. And the burden ... is upon the complainant to allege ... ...
-
Brady v. Irby
...were fraudulent. 20 Cyc. 413; 18 Ark. 172; Id. 123; 48 N.W. 573; 15 F. 541. See also on the question of conveyances from husband to wife, 134 U.S. 405; 20 Cyc. 603; 9 Am. Rep. 697; 8 Ark. 470; Id. 84; 74 Ark. 161, 165; 29 Ark. 407; 55 Ark. 116; 56 Ark. 253; 75 Ark. 127; 101 U.S. 731; 8 Whea......
-
Mohar v. McLelland Lumber Co.
...151 U.S. 607, 14 S.Ct. 442, 38 L.Ed. 286 (1894).17 Lumpkins v. McPhee, 59 N.M. 442, 286 P.2d 299 (1955); cf. Schreyer v. Platt, 134 U.S. 405, 10 S.Ct. 579, 33 L.Ed. 955 (1890).18 See W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Barnette, 253 Ala. 433, 44 So.2d 585, (1950); Crabb v. Morrissey, 31 Neb. 161, 47 N.W.......
-
Ing Trusts and the State of California
...Comments to the Uniform Voidable Transaction Act (Apr. 11, 2016) No. 319, LISI Asset Protection News.29. E.g., Schreyer v. Scott (1890) 134 US 405.30. E.g., Belfance v. Bushey (6th Cir. Bk. App. Panel 1997).31. 2012 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8542 (Nov. 26, 2012, G045813).32. Treas. Reg. sectio......