Schwartz v. United States Dept. of Justice
| Decision Date | 30 August 1977 |
| Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 76-2039. |
| Citation | 435 F. Supp. 1203 |
| Parties | Robert Bennett SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia |
Robert Bennett Schwartz, pro se.
John Oliver Birch, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for defendants.
This is an action in which plaintiff seeks certain records from the Department of Justice and Peter A. Rodino, Jr., Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives, on the investigation of one Peter R. Schlam. The Department of Justice is sued under the Freedom of Information Act. Mr. Rodino is sued under the common law right of access to public records. The matter is now before the Court on Mr. Rodino's motion to dismiss. Mr. Rodino claims that Congress is not subject to the common law rule which gives citizens a right of access to public records.
The historic common law right to inspect and copy public records is recognized in this jurisdiction. United States v. Mitchell, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 293, 551 F.2d 1252, 1257 (1976). The general rule is that all three branches of government, legislative, executive, and judicial, are subject to the common law right. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co. v. Curtis, 335 S.W.2d 934, 936 (Ky. 1959), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 910, 81 S.Ct. 272, 5 L.Ed.2d 224 (1960), partially overruled on other grounds, St. Matthews v. Voice of St. Matthews, Inc., 519 S.W.2d 811 (Ky. 1974); 66 Am.Jur.2d Records and Recording Laws § 15 (1973).
Defendant Rodino has set forth no persuasive reason why Congress should be exempted from the common law rule. It is true that Congress has exempted itself from the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, by 5 U.S.C. § 551(1)(A). That Act, however, is not coextensive with the common law rule under discussion. It applies to all matters in Government files; the common law rule applies only to "public records." Moreover, we can find no inconsistency or conflict between the Freedom of Information Act and the common law rule. Even if there were an inconsistency or conflict, the Act would have to be construed narrowly, favoring application of the common law, because the Freedom of Information Act is in derogation of the common law.
Accordingly, we hold that Congress is subject to the common law rule which guarantees the public a right to inspect and copy public records....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Schiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-3790 (BAH)
...U.S. Dep't of Justice , 331 F.3d 918, 936 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (citing WLF II , 89 F.3d at 903–04 ); see also Schwartz v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 435 F. Supp. 1203, 1204 (D.D.C. 1977) (holding "that Congress is subject to the common law rule which guarantees the public a right to inspect and co......
-
Washington Legal Foundation v. U.S. Sentencing Com'n
...Cir.1980) (common law right applies to video tapes admitted into evidence in Abscam prosecutions). But see Schwartz v. United States Dept. of Justice, 435 F.Supp. 1203 (D.D.C.1977) (common law right applies to Congress), aff'd, 595 F.2d 888 (D.C.Cir.1979) Unlike the district court in the pr......
-
Leopold v. Manger
...U.S. Dep't of Justice, 331 F.3d 918, 936 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (citing WLFII, 89 F.3d at 903-04); see also Schwartz v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 435 F.Supp. 1203, 1204 (D.D.C. 1977) (holding “that Congress is subject to the common law rule which guarantees the public a right to inspect and copy pub......
-
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Schiff
...government, legislative, executive, and judicial, are subject to the common law right." Id. at 903 (quoting Schwartz v. U.S. Dep't of Just. , 435 F. Supp. 1203, 1203 (D.D.C. 1977) ). The right of access is "a precious common law right ... that predates the Constitution itself." United State......
-
New York's freedom from information law: disclosure of public costs of a New York senator's "public interest" mailings.
...have made available under a pre-FOIA federal "common laW" right is still available. See Schwartz v. United States Dep't of Justice, 435 F. Supp. 1203, 1204 (D.D.C. 1977), aff'd, 595 F.2d 88 (D.C. Cir. 1979). For example, in Schwartz, the plaintiff sought records from the late Congressman Pe......