Schwarz v. Schwarz
| Decision Date | 10 November 2010 |
| Citation | 10 A.3d 525,299 Conn. 909 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Majella W. SCHWARZ v. Alan L. SCHWARZ. |
Arnold M. Potash, Seymour, in support of the petition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn.App. 472, 5 A.3d 548 (2010), is denied.
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
Spencer v. Spencer
...(Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Schwarz v. Schwarz, 124 Conn. App. 472, 485, 5 A.3d 548, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 909, 10 A.3d 525 (2010).Mindful of the broad and liberal discretion that a trial court enjoys in fashioning alimony orders, we have no difficulty in concludin......
-
McKeon v. Lennon, AC 34078
...5 A.3d 548 (upholding trial court's finding that 20 percent increase in gross income was a substantial change), cert denied, 299 Conn. 909, 10 A.3d 525 (2010); Serby v. Serby, 4 Conn. App. 398, 401, 494 A.2d 617 (1985) (upholding 20 percent increase in gross income was substantial change). ......
-
Dan v. Dan
...that Hardisty v. Hardisty, 183 Conn. 253, 439 A.2d 307 (1981), and Schwarz v. Schwarz, 124 Conn. App. 472, 5 A.3d 548, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 909, 10 A.3d 525 (2010), support the proposition that an increase in the supporting spouse's income, standing alone, is sufficient justification to ......
-
Nappo v. Nappo
...of its action." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Schwarz v. Schwarz , 124 Conn. App. 472, 476, 5 A.3d 548, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 909, 10 A.3d 525 (2010). "As has often been explained, the foundation for this standard is that the trial court is in a clearly advantageous position to asse......
Request a trial to view additional results