Schwebel v. Orrick, 14103.
| Decision Date | 30 January 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 14103.,14103. |
| Citation | 251 F.2d 919 |
| Parties | Morris Mac SCHWEBEL, Appellant, v. Andrew D. ORRICK, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent, Appellees |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Mr. Chester T. Lane, New York City, for appellant. Mr. Alexander B. Hawes, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.
Mr. David Ferber, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, with whom Mr. Thomas G. Meeker, Gen. Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, was on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and DANAHER and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
Writ of Certiorari Denied April 7, 1958. See 78 S.Ct. 716.
Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission's authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 190 F.2d 605.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Matter of Koden
...supra; Herman v. Dulles, 205 F.2d 715 (D.C.Cir.1953); Schwebel v. Orrick, 153 F.Supp. 701 (D.D.C.1957), affirmed on other grounds, 251 F.2d 919 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927 (1958). Consequently, the General's power under section 103(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to......
-
Colley v. James
...the act charged.") (citing Air Transport Assocs. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd. , 199 F.2d 181, 186 (1953) ), aff'd on other grounds , 251 F.2d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1958). Because a willfulness finding does not require evidence of ill intent, under the facts presented here it is irrelevant that Plainti......
-
Fontaine v. Securities and Exchange Commission
...U.S.App.D.C. 75, 317 F.2d 139, 142-143; Peoples Securities Co. v. Gadsby (C.A.D.C. No. 14,381, March 25, 1958); Schwebel v. Orrick, (1958) 102 U.S.App.D.C. 210, 251 F.2d 919. It has been repeatedly held that the federal securities laws should be interpreted to effectuate the Congressional p......
-
Koden v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
...who failed to conform to such standards. In Schwebel v. Orrick, 153 F.Supp. 701, 704 (D.D.C.1957), aff'd on other grounds, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 210, 251 F.2d 919, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927, 78 S.Ct. 716, 2 L.Ed.2d 759 (1958) (footnotes omitted), the court In the exercise of its jurisdiction to......