Scott County v. Stamper

Citation425 N.E.2d 264
Decision Date10 September 1981
Docket NumberNo. 1-481A125,1-481A125
PartiesSCOTT COUNTY, Indiana: Lynn Jackson, Commissioner: James Peacock, Commissioner: and Elmer Arbuckle, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellants, v. Alfretta STAMPER, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hobart Stamper, Jr., Jeffrey Stamper and Pauline Stamper, Plaintiffs-Appellees.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Indiana

Jerome F. Jacobi, Fox & Smith, Jeffersonville, for defendants-appellants.

Thomas E. Everitt, Everitt, Houston & Thompson, Scottsburg, for plaintiffs-appellees.

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Scott County brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of summary judgment. We affirm.

Hobart Stamper was killed on July 29, 1978, when, for unexplained reasons, his vehicle collided with a tree located along the shoulder of a Scott County road. He was survived by his widow and two minor children. On March 26, 1980, nearly twenty months after the accident, the Scott County Commissioners received a written notice of a claim relating to that accident pursuant to the provisions of the Indiana Tort Claims Act, Ind.Code 34-4-16.5-1 et seq. On July 9, 1980, the plaintiffs (Stamper) brought a wrongful death action against Scott County. The decedent's personal representative, Mrs. Stamper, had been appointed the previous day. Scott County filed a motion to dismiss, which was subsequently treated as a motion for summary judgment, which was denied. This appeal follows and, as stated in Scott County's brief, presents the sole issue of whether the minor dependents are "incompetent" within the meaning of Ind.Code 34-4-16.5-8 to give notice of a claim in a wrongful death action.

A claim under the Indiana Tort Claims Act is barred unless notice to the political subdivision is filed with the governing body within 180 days of the loss. Ind.Code 34-4-16.5-7. If a person is incompetent to give notice, the claim is barred unless notice is given within 180 days after the incompetency is removed. IC 34-4-16.5-8. Incompetent persons includes persons under 18 years of age. Ind.Code 34-4-16.5-2(3).

It is Scott County's position that the right to bring a wrongful death action under Ind.Code 34-1-1-2, § 2 rests with the personal representative, who is not an incompetent person, therefore, the notice of claim must be given within 180 days of loss.

We disagree for several reasons.

First, we believe that a fair reading of the Tort Claims Act regarding an incompetent giving notice does not support Scott County's position. Had it been the legislature's intent to support the position taken by Scott County, it could have done so by emulating Ind.Code 16-9.5-3-1 of the Medical Malpractice Act, wherein the statute of limitations is not affected by incompetency or disability of any sort. Instead, the Tort Claims Act provides for the existence of incompetency to protect the claimants or their survivors.

Also, it is generally conceded that the purpose of a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Indiana Dept. of Public Welfare v. Clark
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 30 Mayo 1985
    ...with the ITCA in actions involving statutorily created rights; most notably in wrongful death actions. See e.g., Scott County v. Stamper (1981), Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 264, trans. denied (180 day notice provision applied in wrongful death action against political subdivision); Speidel v. Stat......
  • Rodgers v. Martinsville School Corp., 06A01-8710-CV-261
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 25 Abril 1988
    ...notice requirements of the Tort Claims Act is a procedural prerequisite to recovery against a government entity. Scott County v. Stamper (1981), Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 264; Hedges v. Rawley (1981), Ind.App., 419 N.E.2d 224. Failure to give a timely notice to a governmental entity is a jurisdi......
  • Teague v. Boone
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 20 Diciembre 1982
    ...language of the act. Failure to file a timely notice of claim results in a jurisdictional bar to claimants' action. Scott County v. Stamper (1981), Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 264; Hedges v. Rawley (1981), Ind.App., 419 N.E.2d 224. A jurisdictional bar to the claim resulting from a failure to file......
  • Lett v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 1 Marzo 1988
    ...2893, 90 L.Ed.2d 980. However, the 180 day notice period may be extended due to incompetency. Dunn, at 1125; Scott County v. Stampler (1981), Ind.App., 425 N.E.2d 264, 265, trans. denied; Coghill v. Badger (1981), Ind.App., 418 N.E.2d 1201, 1207. Indiana Code section 34-4-16.5-8 provides as......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT