Scott v. Lester

Decision Date19 December 1978
Docket NumberNo. 34083,34083
Citation242 Ga. 730,251 S.E.2d 257
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
PartiesSCOTT et al. v. LESTER.

Westmoreland, Hall, McGee, Warner & Oxford, Jack A. Wotton, Clifford Oxford, Atlanta, for appellants.

G. Hughel Harrison, John F. Doran, Jr., Lawrenceville, for appellee.

JORDAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment denying specific performance of an option to purchase real property.

Herman H. Scott and John H. Stone brought a complaint against Geneva Thompson Lester, Executrix of the estate of Ruth J. Thompson, seeking specific performance of an option given them by Mrs. Thompson, or, in the alternative, for damages.After hearing evidence, the trial judge held that the description of the property in the contract was inadequate to support an action for specific performance or damages, and judgment was entered in favor of the executrix.

In March, 1969, the appellants entered into a contract with Mrs. Thompson, in which she agreed to sell them "all that tract of land being in Land Lot 75 of the 7th District of Gwinnett County, Georgia, running along Georgia HighwayNo. 316, with a sixty (60) foot right of way into Harrington Road; same being about twenty-six (26) acres (more or less to be determined by survey to be attached later at purchaser's expense); same being adjacent to seller's home place on the Duluth-Lawrenceville Highway (Harrington Road)."

The contract contained the following additional agreement: "Purchaser shall have first refusal to purchase seller's home place adjacent to the acreage set out in this contract, in the event of seller's death, or if she elects to sell same at a later date.The purchase price for said land will be Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1,500) per acre and the seller herein will give to the purchaser notice of her desire to sell and the purchaser shall have ninety (90) days after said notice to complete said purchase.If the purchaser herein does not buy said land at that time, which is to say at the end of ninety (90) days, then the seller may sell it to anyone whom she wishes."

Thereafter a survey was made, and agreed to by Mrs. Thompson, as to the location of the line between Mrs. Thompson's home place and the property to be conveyed, and in June, 1969, Mrs. Thompson conveyed 32.728 acres to the appellants pursuant to their contract.The closing statement, signed by Mrs. Thompson and the appellants, recited: "The first refusal option as appears in contract between the parties dated March, 1969 and recorded in Deed Book 318, page 548, Gwinnett County Records shall survive this closing."

Mrs. Thompson lived in the portion she retained of her property until her death.She owned no other property in the county.

The trial judge erred in refusing to grant specific performance to the appellants.The judge relied on Plantation Land Co. v. Bradshaw, 232 Ga. 435, 207 S.E.2d 49(1974).If Mrs. Thompson had refused to convey the first tract of land and the appellants had sought to enforce the contract, the Plantation Land Company case would have been in point, since at that...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Hargrett v. Hargrett
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1978
  • Henry v. Blankenship
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 28 Septiembre 2005
    ...land, the fairness and adequacy of the option price are measured by the land value at the time of the contract. See Scott v. Lester, 242 Ga. 730, 732, 251 S.E.2d 257 (1978). In view of the foregoing, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting Blankenship's motion for summary judgmen......
  • Rohrig Invs. v. Knuckle P'ship (In re Rohrig Invs.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • 27 Enero 2022
    ...preparation of a Draft Deed that followed the property lines on the 2014 Survey and sent that Draft Deed to Plaintiff. In analogizing to Scott, the District Court While this case did not involve a subsequent transaction, after the execution of the Settlement Agreement and the completion of ......
  • Worthey v. Holmes
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 4 Febrero 1982
    ...the sale of land often contain obligations which are not performed by delivery and acceptance of the warranty deed. Scott v. Lester, 242 Ga. 730, 731, 251 S.E.2d 257 (1978); Moxley v. Adams, 190 Ga. 164(3), 8 S.E.2d 525 (1940); SanJoi, Inc. v. Peek, 140 Ga.App. 397, 231 S.E.2d 145 (1976). T......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT