Scott v. Lester
Decision Date | 19 December 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 34083,34083 |
Citation | 242 Ga. 730,251 S.E.2d 257 |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Parties | SCOTT et al. v. LESTER. |
Westmoreland, Hall, McGee, Warner & Oxford, Jack A. Wotton, Clifford Oxford, Atlanta, for appellants.
G. Hughel Harrison, John F. Doran, Jr., Lawrenceville, for appellee.
This appeal is from a judgment denying specific performance of an option to purchase real property.
Herman H. Scott and John H. Stone brought a complaint against Geneva Thompson Lester, Executrix of the estate of Ruth J. Thompson, seeking specific performance of an option given them by Mrs. Thompson, or, in the alternative, for damages.After hearing evidence, the trial judge held that the description of the property in the contract was inadequate to support an action for specific performance or damages, and judgment was entered in favor of the executrix.
In March, 1969, the appellants entered into a contract with Mrs. Thompson, in which she agreed to sell them "all that tract of land being in Land Lot 75 of the 7th District of Gwinnett County, Georgia, running along Georgia HighwayNo. 316, with a sixty (60) foot right of way into Harrington Road; same being about twenty-six (26) acres (more or less to be determined by survey to be attached later at purchaser's expense); same being adjacent to seller's home place on the Duluth-Lawrenceville Highway (Harrington Road)."
The contract contained the following additional agreement:
Thereafter a survey was made, and agreed to by Mrs. Thompson, as to the location of the line between Mrs. Thompson's home place and the property to be conveyed, and in June, 1969, Mrs. Thompson conveyed 32.728 acres to the appellants pursuant to their contract.The closing statement, signed by Mrs. Thompson and the appellants, recited: "The first refusal option as appears in contract between the parties dated March, 1969 and recorded in Deed Book 318, page 548, Gwinnett County Records shall survive this closing."
Mrs. Thompson lived in the portion she retained of her property until her death.She owned no other property in the county.
The trial judge erred in refusing to grant specific performance to the appellants.The judge relied on Plantation Land Co. v. Bradshaw, 232 Ga. 435, 207 S.E.2d 49(1974).If Mrs. Thompson had refused to convey the first tract of land and the appellants had sought to enforce the contract, the Plantation Land Company case would have been in point, since at that...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
- Hargrett v. Hargrett
-
Henry v. Blankenship
...land, the fairness and adequacy of the option price are measured by the land value at the time of the contract. See Scott v. Lester, 242 Ga. 730, 732, 251 S.E.2d 257 (1978). In view of the foregoing, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting Blankenship's motion for summary judgmen......
-
Rohrig Invs. v. Knuckle P'ship (In re Rohrig Invs.)
...preparation of a Draft Deed that followed the property lines on the 2014 Survey and sent that Draft Deed to Plaintiff. In analogizing to Scott, the District Court While this case did not involve a subsequent transaction, after the execution of the Settlement Agreement and the completion of ......
-
Worthey v. Holmes
...the sale of land often contain obligations which are not performed by delivery and acceptance of the warranty deed. Scott v. Lester, 242 Ga. 730, 731, 251 S.E.2d 257 (1978); Moxley v. Adams, 190 Ga. 164(3), 8 S.E.2d 525 (1940); SanJoi, Inc. v. Peek, 140 Ga.App. 397, 231 S.E.2d 145 (1976). T......