Scott v. Slaughter

Decision Date07 January 1904
CitationScott v. Slaughter, 77 S.W. 949, 97 Tex. 244 (Tex. 1904)
PartiesSCOTT v. SLAUGHTER.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Appeal from Court of Civil Appeals of Fifth Supreme Judicial District.

Action by Winfield Scott against C. C. Slaughter. From the judgment rendered, plaintiff appeals to the Court of Civil Appeals. On motion to dismiss, the question is certified to the Supreme Court whether the record is sufficient to require consideration of the appeal. Answered in the affirmative.

Matlock, Miller & Dycus, for appellant. K. R. Craig and G. G. Wright, for appellee.

WILLIAMS, J.

Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District, as follows:

"In view of the opinion, as we understand it, delivered by the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth Supreme Judicial District, sitting at San Antonio, in the case of Thaison v. Sanchez, 35 S. W. 478, in which opinion this court does not concur, we deem it advisable to present to the Supreme Court of the state of Texas, for adjudication, the following issue of law arising in the above-entitled cause of Winfield Scott, appellant, v. C. C. Slaughter, appellee. "Statement.

"The record before us contains nothing more than an agreed statement of facts, made and filed by the parties in the court below, upon which the case was tried, the judgment of the court, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court, assignments of error, and the appeal bond. The pleadings are omitted, and there is no agreement and statement as to what the issues were on the trial of the cause. The agreed statement of facts is dated May 1, 1903, signed by the attorneys of the respective parties, and properly certified to be correct by the judge before whom the case was tried, and was made, signed, and filed before the trial in the lower court. The agreed statement contains the following:

"`Winfield Scott vs. C. C. Slaughter. No. 22079. In the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, 44th Judicial District. We hereby agree that the following is a statement of the facts in the above styled and numbered cause, and that the controversy herein may be submitted to the court on same as an agreed statement of facts.'

"Then follows a statement of the facts agreed on, and is signed by the attorneys for the respective parties. The statement of facts is certified to be correct by the judge before whom the case was tried, and that said cause was tried upon said agreed statement of facts and exhibits and no other testimony. The judgment was rendered for plaintiff on the 1st day of May, 1903, for the sum of $1,325.69. Said...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Cobb v. Harrington
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • November 14, 1945
    ...has been held that when a case is tried on an agreed statement of facts under Article 2177 the pleadings are immaterial. Scott v. Slaughter, 97 Tex. 244, 77 S.W. 949; Jones v. Hext, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 441, application for writ of error refused. See also Bigfoot Independent School Distr......
  • State ex rel. White v. Bradley
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 6, 1997
    ... Page 725 ... 956 S.W.2d 725 ... The STATE of Texas on the Relation of Dale WHITE, Appellant, ... Scott BRADLEY, Appellee ... No. 2-97-259-CV ... Court of Appeals of Texas, ... Fort Worth ... Nov. 6, 1997 ...         HOLMAN, ... ...
  • Banker v. Jefferson County Water Control and Imp. Dist. No. One
    • United States
    • Texas Civil Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1955
    ...it seems to be well established that the pleadings of the parties are not of material consequence. Rule 263, T.R.C.P.; Scott v. Slaughter, 97 Tex. 244, 77 S.W. 949; Cobb v. Harrington, 144 Tex. 360, 190 S.W.2d 709, 172 A.L.R. 837; Patton v. Wilson, Tex.Civ.App., 220 S.W.2d The procedure ado......
  • Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 1933
    ...of facts which is submitted to the court under art. 2177, that all issues with regard to the pleadings are immaterial. Scott v. Slaughter, 97 Tex. 244, 77 S. W. 949; Harde v. Germania Life Ins. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 153 S. W. 666; Thaison v. Sanchez, 13 Tex. Civ. App. 73, 35 S. W. The first ......
  • Get Started for Free