Scott v. State
Decision Date | 15 March 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 49043,No. 2,49043,2 |
Citation | 206 S.E.2d 137,131 Ga.App. 504 |
Parties | Jerry SCOTT v. The STATE |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Ben Lancaster, Cartersville, for appellant.
David N. Vaughan, Jr., Dist. Atty., Cartersville, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The probationer appeals from the revocation of his probation. The enumeration of error is on the general grounds.
' The only question before us is whether the evidence in this case is sufficient to authorize the revocation of a probationary sentence under Code Ann. § 27-2713.
" Probation is granted as a privilege, and not as a matter of right; and the revocation of the probation is punishment for the crime for which the defendant was convicted in the first instance.' Johnson v. State, 214 Ga. 818, 819, 108 S.E.2d 313; Cross v. Huff, 208 Ga. 392, 396, 67 S.E.2d 124. Probation of sentence '. . . comes as an act of grace to one convicted of a crime. . . .' Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490, 492, 55 S.Ct. 818, 819, 79 L.Ed. 1566. 'The defendant stands convicted; he faces punishment and cannot insist on terms or strike a bargain.' Burns v. United States,287 U.S. 216, 220, 53 S.Ct. 154, 155, 77 L.Ed. 266.
' This does not mean that the probationer can be made the victim of whim or caprice. Williams v. State, 162 Ga. 327, 328, 133 S.E. 843; Sparks v. State, 77 Ga.App. 22, 24, 47 S.E.2d 678; Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 223, 53 S.Ct. 154, 77 L.Ed. 266, supra. Our statutes (Code Ann. § 27-2713 and former Code § 27-2705) expressly give him the right to notice and a hearing on the question of revoking probation. Johnson v. State, 214 Ga. 818, 819, 108 S.E.2d 313, supra; Balkcom v. Gunn, 206 Ga. 167, 56 S.E.2d 482. The failure to afford the probationer such notice and a hearing would render a revocation order void for lack of due process of law. Lester v. Foster, 207 Ga. 596, 63 S.E.2d 402. However, a hearing on a revocation '. . . is not a trial on a criminal charge. . . .' and the probationer has no right to a trial by jury. Johnson v. State, 214 Ga. 818, 819, 108 S.E.2d 313, 314, supra. It is somewhat like an application for a change of venue, which is 'of a civil nature.' See Wilburn v. State, 140 Ga. 138, 140, 78 S.E. 819.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dickerson v. State
...108 S.E.2d 313 and by many cases which have applied Johnson such as Sellers v. State, 107 Ga.App. 516, 130 S.E.2d 790; Scott v. State, 131 Ga.App. 504, 206 S.E.2d 137 and Clarkler v. State, 130 Ga.App. 738, 204 S.E.2d 472. It would indeed be ridiculous to hold (as appellant would have us do......
-
In re N.M.
...596, 597, 63 S.E.2d 402 (1951), for the proposition that a juvenile court may not revoke probation sua sponte, and Scott v. State, 131 Ga.App. 504, 206 S.E.2d 137 (1974), regarding due process concerns). In the criminal context, it is clear that postrevocation penalties relate to the origin......
-
Thornton v. State
...to the terms and conditions outlined in the order of probation. Dutton v. Willis, 223 Ga. 209, 211, 154 S.E.2d 221, 223; Scott v. State, 131 Ga.App. 504, 206 S.E.2d 137. The Fifth Amendment prohibition against putting any person twice in jeopardy of life or limb applies only to twice subjec......
-
Johnson v. State
...to support a finding of a probationary violation in the cases of Dickerson v. State, 136 Ga.App. 885, 222 S.E.2d 649; Scott v. State, 131 Ga.App. 504, 206 S.E.2d 137; David v. State, 139 Ga.App. 335, 228 S.E.2d 362 and Hammond v. State, 139 Ga.App. 365, 228 S.E.2d It is therefore well settl......