Scott v. Ward

Decision Date11 February 1936
Docket Number1923
Citation54 P.2d 805,49 Wyo. 243
PartiesSCOTT v. WARD
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

APPEAL from the District Court of Teton County; V. J. TIDBALL Judge.

Proceeding by W. A. Scott, who sues in his own behalf and in behalf of all other citizens, voters, and electors of Teton County similarly situated, against Ercel J. Ward. From an adverse judgment, the plaintiff appeals.

Case dismissed.

For the plaintiff and appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of William L. Simpson, of Jackson, and Milward L. Simpson, of Cody.

The question involved in this case is whether a candidate for public office who circulated a card announcing that he would accept a ten per cent cut in the salary of such office, if elected, is under the law qualified to hold the office, and whether his election should be declared void. Chapter 36 Articles 648, 1622 and 1707 and also Chapter 36, Article 19 entire, seem to apply. The salary of Treasurer of Teton County is fixed by statute at $ 1,500 per year. Chapter 20 Article 1102. Candidates for public office are not permitted to offer pecuniary inducements to voters for their election. They are required to take an oath that they have not done so. Constitution, Article VI, Section 20. A false oath disqualifies such candidate from any office or trust within the state. A candidate for office invalidates his election by a promise to the electors that if elected, he will serve for a smaller compensation than that provided by law. Prentiss v. Dittmer, 93 O. S. 314; Corrothers v Russell, 53 Iowa 346; Diehl v. Toggen, 32 N.D. 131; Bush v. Head, 154 Cal. 277; State ex rel. Bill v. Elting, 29 Kan. 397; State ex rel. Newell v. Purdy, 36 Wis. 213; State v. Church, 5 Ore. 375. Plaintiff is not required to prove the number of voters thus influenced. The Prentiss case above cited is followed by an exhaustive note. The cases cited have statutes similar to the Wyoming statute authorizing a judgment declaring the office vacant and such an election void. Chapter 36, Secs. 1622 and 1707, R. S. 1931. Respondent cites the case of Hamilton v. Marshall, (Wyo.) 282 P. 1058, in support of his contention that it is "essential to allege and prove the number of illegal votes and that such number was sufficient to effect the result." That case is not in point. In this case there was no question of corrupt practice, but instead the propriety of throwing out illegal votes in one precinct alleged to have been cast after the polls could no longer be legally kept open.

For the defendant and respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of P. W. Spaulding, of Evanston.

Appellant's action is not a contest under the statute, nor a quo warranto proceeding. All he asks is that the office of defendant be annulled and declared void. He is asking nothing for himself, except to consume the time of this court. After the election in 1932, Scott the appellant insisted upon holding possession of the Treasurer's office and all records pertaining thereto, without giving any bond, and the County Commissioners, following the provisions of Section 30-120, R. S. 1931, appointed the respondent to the office to which he was elected at the preceding election. The case surely has become moot. It is admitted that the offer to accept a ten per cent cut in salary was induced by the County Commissioners and that the defendant acted in good faith. There is no allegation that a sufficient number of voters were influenced by the card and would have changed the result. This disposes of the case as a contest. Hamilton v. Marshall, 282 P. 1059. Every elector is eligible to the office for which he is an elector. Bush v. Head, 97 P. 514. If a fraudulent intention is absent, no offense has been committed. Prentiss v. Dittmer, L. R. A. 1917B, 194. The petition fails to state a cause of action. State v. Church, (Ore.) 20 Am. Rep. 748. It must be shown that voters were influenced by the card in question. Newell v. Purdy, (Wis.) 17 Am. Rep. 485. The text in 20 C. J. at 188 is not supported by the cases, except the closing sentence, to the effect that a promise by a candidate to particular voters of the county to donate his salary to the county, will not constitute bribery unless such voters are taxpayers of the county. The pleadings in this case clearly show that it is a moot case. North Laramie v. Hoffman, 201 P. 1023. The term of office involved ended nearly a year ago. This court has held that it has no right to proceed in cases that have become moot. Scott, et al. v. Columbia S. & L. Association, 49 P.2d 488.

RINER, Justice. KIMBALL, Ch. J., and BLUME, J., concur.

OPINION

RINER, Justice.

This case is here through direct appeal proceedings taken concerning a judgment of the District Court of Teton County rendered January 28, 1935, and filed February 1, 1935, that the plaintiff take nothing by his action. The cause was tried solely upon the plaintiff's amended petition filed October 2, 1933, the answer thereto of the defendant filed January 5, 1934, and a stipulation of the parties relative to these pleadings and submitting the cause for decision, filed November 20, 1934.

The action appears to be one regarded by appellant somewhat in the nature of an election contest, though the plaintiff, who was a candidate for the office of County Treasurer of Teton County against the defendant at the general election held November 8, 1932, does not claim the office, conceding as he does that the defendant received a majority of the votes cast, that a certificate of election was issued to him and that he took over the office.

The principal claim of the plaintiff's pleading is that the defendant, during his campaign for election, "circulated, uttered and published" a card to numerous voters of the county aforesaid, on which card he stated: "If elected I shall conduct my office efficiently and with fairness to all. I shall take a voluntary cut of ten per cent in salary, and will not cause the County any expense for deputies." It is alleged that this was done with the intent to corruptly influence the votes of the electors in defendant's favor. The defendant's answer admits that he caused to be printed a card of the nature above described, but denies that he published, uttered or circulated such cards with the intent "to offer said voters or electors or any of them a bribe to vote for said defendant or for the purpose of influencing or corrupting the vote of such electors or any of them by means of a promise or a reward or in any manner at all." The answer also denies that these cards were circulated to more than eighty voters, and further alleges that the County Commissioners of said County, during the summer of 1932, had requested all the then county officers to accept a reduction of ten per cent in their respective salaries, and that this action on their part was common knowledge in said County.

We are asked by appellant to rule that defendant by his circulation of these cards thereby disqualified himself from holding the office of County Treasurer. Our attention is directed to many decisions from other jurisdictions dealing with pre-election promises of candidates for office of the nature herein involved, among them being State v. Elting, 29 Kan. 397, wherein, after citing numerous pertinent cases, Justice Brewer very forcibly said:

"In the closing and degenerate days of Rome's august empire preceding its immediate downfall, the imperial purple was sold at public auction to the highest bidder. Equally base and equally significant of present decay and impending downfall would be the toleration of the private purchase of electoral votes. That which is wrong when done directly, is equally wrong when done indirectly. Salaries are paid by taxation, and when a candidate offers to take less than the stated salary, he offers to reduce pro tanto the amount of taxes which each individual must pay. If the candidate went to each elector and offered to pay one dollar of his taxes, that clearly would be direct bribery; and when he offers to take such a salary as will reduce the tax upon each tax-payer one dollar, he is indirectly making the same offer of pecuniary gain to the voter; so that those cases rest upon the simple proposition that the election of a candidate for office cannot be secured by personal bribery offered directly or indirectly to the voter.

* * * *

"A further question may arise when the offer of the candidate carries with it no pecuniary benefit to the voter. As, for instance, should a candidate for a county office offer to give, if elected, a portion of his salary for the erection of a public fountain; or if a candidate for a state office should offer if elected to endow a chair in some college--here it may be said that the voter is in no way influenced by considerations of personal gain. He receives no money in hand, his taxes will not be reduced and he may in no manner be pecuniarily benefited by the donation. This presents a case going still...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Sylvester v. Armstrong, 2066
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • 5 December 1938
    ...notice was served, and on that acconut is insufficient. Brewer v. Bros., 43 Wyo. 433; Bank v. Investors Corporation, 48 Wyo. 319; Scott v. Ward, 49 Wyo. 243. An abstract of record should show that the appellate court has jurisdiction. Brewer v. Folsom Bros., 43 Wyo. 433; Fryer v. Campbell (......
  • Civic Ass'n. of Wyoming v. Railway Motor Fuels, Inc., 2196
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • 19 August 1941
    ...... 45 Wyo. 425, 19 P.2d 958; Fryer v. Campbell, 46 Wyo. 491, 28 P.2d 475; Scott v. Ward, 49 Wyo. 243, 54. P.2d 805. . . It. results that the judgment of the ......
  • Board of Com'rs. of Natrona County v. Casper Nat. Bank, 2132
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • 12 December 1939
    ...... 45 Wyo. 425; St. Clair v. St. Clair, 46 Wyo. 446;. Fryer v. Campbell, 46 Wyo. 491; Scott v. Ward, 49 Wyo. 243; Harris v. Schoonmaker, 50. Wyo. 119; Chemical Co. v. Board of Land ... . in. connection with Rule 13 of this Court, as amended [55 Wyo. 149] August 14, 1923, whose language at present is verbatim:. . . "Nothing. which could have been properly ......
  • State, Dept. of Revenue and Taxation, Motor Vehicle Div. v. Andrews
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming
    • 31 October 1983
    ...v. Warren, 70 Wyo. 296, 249 P.2d 163 (1952); State ex rel. Schwartz v. Jones, 61 Wyo. 350, 157 P.2d 993 (1945); and Scott v. Ward, 49 Wyo. 243, 54 P.2d 805 (1936). Furthermore, we note that in three cases decided on the same day this court dismissed appeals taken in actions involving tempor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT