Screvane v. Lomenzo, 449
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 86 S.Ct. 90,15 L.Ed.2d 15,382 U.S. 11 |
| Docket Number | No. 449,449 |
| Parties | Paul R. SCREVANE, President of City Council of City of New York, et al. v. John P. LOMENZO, Secretary of State of New York, et al. . Leo A. Larkin, Morris Handel and George H. P. Dwight, for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Asst. Sol. Gen., Donald Zimmerman, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard B. Sand and Max Gross, for appellees |
| Decision Date | 11 October 1965 |
v.
John P. LOMENZO, Secretary of State of New York, et al.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Leo A. Larkin, Morris Handel and George H. P. Dwight, for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Asst. Sol. Gen., Donald Zimmerman, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard B. Sand and Max Gross, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, see WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, 86 S.Ct. 24.]
To continue reading
Request your trial
26 cases
- Epstein v. Lordi
-
Soft Drink Workers Union Local 812, Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. N.L.R.B., 79-1888
...requirement. Nat'l Maritime Union v. NLRB (Delta Steamship Lines), 346 F.2d 411, 414-415 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 840, 86 S.Ct. 90, 15 L.Ed.2d 82 (1965). Rather, we have construed that section as a definitional provision only, designed to ensure uniform meaning to an important phr......
- Allied Intern., Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO, AFL-CIO
-
Skolnick v. State Electoral Board of Illinois, 69 C 755.
...238 F.Supp. 927. Justice Harlan, concurring in the United States Supreme Court's summary affirmance of WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo, 382 U.S. 4, 86 S.Ct. 90, 15 L.Ed.2d 15 (1965), asserted without reservation the principle that any final apportionment plan must comport with state as well as federa......
Request a trial to view additional results