Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Moore

Decision Date27 February 1912
Docket Number2,221.
Citation193 F. 1022
PartiesSEABOARD AIR LINE RY. CO. v. MOORE.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.

Peter O. Knight and J.F.Glen,for plaintiff in error.

Hilton S. Hampton, A. H. King, and Geo. C. Bedell, for defendant in error.

Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The constitutionality and applicability of the act of Congress relating to the liability of common carriers by railroad to their employes, approved April 22, 1908 (35 Stat.pt. 1, p. 65, c. 149 (U.S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1171)), have been passed upon in a recent decision of the Supreme Court in Mondou v. New York, N.H. & Hartford R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 1, 32 Sup.Ct. 169, 56 L.Ed. . . . , handed down January 15, 1912, not yet officially reported. According to this decision, the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and fifteenth assignments of error herein are clearly not sustainable. From an examination of the transcript and briefs, the assignments of error concerning other matters are not well taken. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Enoch L. White's Admrx. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 11 Febrero 1914
    ... ... And supposing ... you were delayed on sidings and after you got back on the ... main line a lot of time is lost, how do you protect your rear ... end?" It was not error to exclude the ... Supreme Court of the United States thereon controls. In ... Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Moore , 113 C.C.A ... 668, 193 F. 1022, this burden was charged to be with the ... ...
  • Schopp v. Muller Dairies, L-7678.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 20 Octubre 1938
    ...be determined according to the provisions of that act,' 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. citing Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Moore, 193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, Id., 228 U.S. 433, 434, 33 S.Ct. 580, 57 L.Ed. 907. "In this court the argument was devoted principally to a discussion of this ruling —cou......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT