Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council, Boy Scouts of America
Decision Date | 10 March 1995 |
Docket Number | No. 70772,70772 |
Citation | 257 Kan. 178,891 P.2d 385 |
Parties | , 63 USLW 2578 Bradford W. SEABOURN, Appellant, v. CORONADO AREA COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a Kansas Not For Profit Corporation, and Boy Scouts of America, a Washington, D.C., Not for Profit Corporation, Appellees. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law. When determining a question of law, this court is not bound by the decision of the district court.
2. Although advertising may be a consideration in determining whether a place is holding itself out to the general public or inviting the public's patronage as a place of public accommodation, advertising alone is
not enough to convert an otherwise private "person" into a place of public accommodation within the meaning of K.S.A. 44-1002(h).
3. Public accommodations include those places of business which are held open to the general public and where members of the general public are invited to come for business purposes. "Public accommodations" as used in K.S.A. 44-1002(h) and "place of public accommodations" as used in K.S.A. 44-1002(i)(1)(A) include those places of business held open to the general public where members of the general public are invited to come for business purposes.
4. As a matter of public policy, Kansas abhors discrimination. However, in the area of public accommodations, the legislative intent is that the term "public accommodation" includes all businesses which can reasonably be described as offering goods, services, facilities, and accommodations to the public. In addition, "public accommodation" may cover those "persons" traditionally considered a public accommodation.
5. Private groups and institutions are not subject to the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, K.S.A. 44-1001 et seq., simply because they operate nongratuitous residential or recreational facilities for their members or participants incidental to their nonbusiness purpose.
6. The scope of public accommodations under K.S.A. 44-1002(h) includes business establishments and those establishments traditionally considered public accommodations. A broad, expansive coverage, divorcing "public accommodations" from business establishments or business purposes, is not the law in Kansas.
7. The record in this case supports the conclusion that the Boy Scouts of America has no business purpose other than maintaining the objectives and programs to which the operation of certain facilities is merely incidental. Relationships in scouting stand in stark contrast to retail or business-like establishments in that scouting relationships are continuous, close, personal, and social and take place, more or less, outside of public view; whereas business establishments or business-like establishments or traditional public accommodations involve interactions between store personnel and patrons that are perfunctory and impersonal, involving the payment of prices which reflect the full cost of what is received.
Robert Littell, Manhattan, argued the cause, and James Grafton Randall, Anaheim Hills, CA, was with him on the briefs for appellant.
John D. Conderman, of Arthur, Green, Arthur, Conderman & Stutzman, Manhattan, argued the cause, and George A. Davidson and Carla A. Kerr, of Hughes Hubbard & Reed, New York City, were with him on the brief for appellee.
Bradford W. Seabourn appeals from summary judgment granted to the defendants, Coronado Area Council, Boy Scouts of America, a Kansas not for profit corporation, and Boy Scouts of America, a Washington, D.C., not for profit corporation (the defendants hereinafter are referred to as the Boy Scouts), ruling that "Boy Scouts is not a public accommodation" as that term is used in the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, K.S.A. 44-1001 et seq.
The court ruled that the Boy Scouts could legally deny Seabourn's registration to serve as an adult leader of the Boy Scouts because of his unwillingness to subscribe to the religious principles of the organization. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we agree that the Boy Scouts are not "public accommodations" under the Kansas Act Against Discrimination and affirm.
The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated in 1910 in the District of Columbia. In 1915, the First Session of the 64th Congress of the United States of America undertook to incorporate the Boy Scouts. Section 3 of the Charter stated:
"That the purpose of this corporation shall be to promote, through organization, and cooperation with other agencies, the ability of boys to do things for themselves and others, to train them in Scoutcraft, and to teach them patriotism, courage, self-reliance, and kindred virtues, using the methods which are now in common use by Boy Scouts."
Section 4 reflected that the "object and purposes [of the Boy Scouts were] solely of a benevolent character and not for pecuniary profit to its members."
In the "Congressional Report in Support of Act to Incorporate Boy Scouts of America" it is stated:
As soon as a boy joins the Boy Scouts, he becomes a member of a patrol, which is a group of three to eight boys of similar age. The goal of the Scout patrol is to help the boy become a good outdoorsman; active in his troop and patrol; physically fit; a knowledgeable, participating citizen; and a young man who lives by the Scout Oath and Law. A Scout troop is composed of all the patrol members. The troop meets less frequently than the patrol, usually for hikes, campouts, camporees with other troops, and a yearly trip to summer camp.
Article VI, § 6, of the bylaws provides that local councils be chartered with jurisdiction over a prescribed geographical area.
Article VII, § 1 states: "Youth membership in Boy Scouts of America is open to all who meet the membership requirements."
Article VIII, § 1 addresses adult leadership:
"No person shall be approved as a leader unless, in the judgment of the Corporation, that person possesses the moral, educational, and emotional qualities deemed necessary for leadership and satisfies such other leadership qualifications as it may from time to time require."
Under Article IX, § 1, the Declaration of Religious Principle appears:
....
....
The Boy...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dale v. Boy Scouts of America
...organization unconnected to a structural facility. Id. at 1269. Likewise, the Kansas Supreme Court in Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council, BSA, 257 Kan. 178, 891 P.2d 385 (1995), gave a narrow interpretation of "public accommodation" under the Kansas Act Against Discrimination. The court held......
-
Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts
...is not a "place of public accommodation or amusement" under title II of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964]; Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council (1995) 257 Kan. 178 (891 P.2d 385) [Boy Scouts not subject to state public accommodation law]; Schwenk v. Boy Scouts of America (1976) 275 Or. 327......
-
Brennan v. Kunzle
...tending to show triable issues must be considered in the light most favorable to those issues." Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council, B.S.A., 257 Kan. 178, 189, 891 P.2d 385 (1995). Discovery of Information Through Reasonable The Brennans maintain, however, that the Kunzles would have discover......
-
Estate of Brodbeck, Matter of, 72990
...in the case. Mitzner v. State Dept. of SRS, 257 Kan. 258, 260-61, 891 P.2d 435 (1995). The court in Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council, B.S.A., 257 Kan. 178, 189, 891 P.2d 385 (1995), addressed what facts are " '[A]n issue of fact is not genuine unless it has legal controlling force as to a ......
-
Nonbelievers and Government Speech
...to “Bear” because they could not comply with religious component of program). 107. Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council, Boy Scouts of Am., 891 P.2d 385, 390–91 (Kan. 1995) (ruling against plaintiff who had been involved with Boy Scouts for over twenty years, the last as an assistant scoutmast......
-
A Practitioner's Guide to Summary Judgment Part 1
...Inc., 17 Kan.App.2d 807, 815, 845 P.2d 65, rev. denied 252 Kan. 1091 (1993). [FN116]. Seabourn v. Coronado Area Council, B.S.A., 257 Kan. 178, 189, 891 P.2d 385 (1995), quoting Secrist v. Turley, 196 Kan. 572, 575, 412 P.2d 976 (1966). Cf. Saliba, 264 Kan. at 142 (Six, J., dissenting; the w......
-
Dale v. Boy Scourts of America: Whether the Application of New Jersey's Public Accommodationsn Law, Forcing the Boy Scouts to Include an Avowed Homosexual, Violates the Scouts' First Amendment Freedom of Expressive Association - Jacob M. Carpenter
...133. Id. The cases mentioned are the following: Curran, 952 P.2d 218 (Cal. 1998); Seaburn v. Coronado Area Council, Boy Scouts of Am., 891 P.2d 385 (Kan. 1995); Quinnipiac Council, Boy Scouts of Am., Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 528 A.2d 352 (Conn. 1987); Schwenk v. B......