Seagraves v. Wallace, 5706
Citation | 41 F.2d 679 |
Decision Date | 18 July 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 5706,5725.,5706 |
Parties | SEAGRAVES v. WALLACE et al. WALLACE et al. v. SEAGRAVES. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
Clyde A. Sweeton, of Houston, Tex. (Clyde A. Sweeton and Vinson, Elkins, Sweeton & Weems, all of Houston, Tex., on the brief), for appellant Seagraves.
S. J. Brooks and John Neethe, both of San Antonio, Tex. (Williams, Neethe & Williams, of Galveston, Tex., and Templeton, Brooks, Napier & Brown, of San Antonio, Tex., on the brief), for appellees Wallace and others.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
This suit asserted claims against O. R, Seagraves (herein called the defendant), based on a written contract entered into in July, 1923, between him and Henry M. Wallace (herein called the plaintiff), as agent for the owners of 2,946½ shares of the capital stock of the Corpus Christi Gas Company, an Arizona corporation, the issued and outstanding capital stock of which was 3,500 shares, each of the par value of $100. That contract (in which the plaintiff as agent was referred to as party of the first part and the defendant was referred to as party of the second part), after recitals as to the capital stock of the corporation mentioned, as to bonds secured by first mortgage on the property of that corporation, some of which had been issued and sold and some of which remained subject to be sold, and that the party of the second part desires to purchase control of the above mentioned 2,946½ shares of capital stock at 25 per cent. of its par or face value, stated that the party of the second part, for and in consideration of the agreements of the party of the first part expressed in the contract, agrees to purchase and pay for the above-mentioned 2,946½ shares of capital stock at 25 per cent. of its face value; the contract providing for the defendant paying $5,000 upon the signing of the contract, $4,600 on or before ten days after the signing of the contract, $3,200 within sixty days from the signing of the contract, for his giving at the time of signing the contract three interest-bearing promissory notes for sums aggregating $10,000, and for his paying the balance of the stated price in minimum installments payable, respectively, in each month from November, 1923, to and including September, 1924; the contract providing for the party of the second part having the right to pay at any time more than the stipulated minimum installments for the purpose of liquidating in full the entire purchase price at the earliest possible date, the party of the second part to receive a ten per cent. per annum discount on cash payments made in advance of the dates prescribed for the payment of the stated minimum installments. The contract contained the following provisions:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Ratliff, 11084.
...outlined. Bowden v. Southern Rock Island Plow Company, supra, is cited with approval by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Seagraves v. Wallace, 41 F.2d 679, a case which arose in Texas and involved a contract for the sale of shares of corporate stock. Seagraves v. Wallace is directly in......
-
Mulherin v. Brown, 6580
...in applying an improper measure of damages in the cause. This point must likewise be sustained. In Seagraves v. Wallace, (Wallace v. Seagraves), 41 F.2d 679, 681, [under Syl. 1-2], is found the following rule as to the measure of damages as to breach of an executory contract for sale of sha......