Seahorse Boat & Barge Corp. v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc.

Decision Date19 May 1980
Docket NumberNo. 77-3501,77-3501
Citation617 F.2d 396
PartiesSEAHORSE BOAT & BARGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Armco Steel Corporation et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

J. Walter Ward Jr., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Terriberry, Carroll, Yancey & Farrell, William E. Wright, Dean A. Sutherland, New Orleans, La., Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, Courtney W. Stanton, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before GOLDBERG, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this suit involving the purchase of a boat by a Louisiana resident from a Florida boatbuilder, plaintiffs claimed subject matter jurisdiction under diversity and admiralty jurisdiction. Jacksonville Shipyards was one of four parties named as defendants to the action. The district court granted Jacksonville Shipyards' motion to dismiss the suit as to itself due to lack of personal jurisdiction, but did not certify the question to this Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b).

In a case involving multiple parties, dismissal of one party is not appealable absent a certification by the district court that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). See Cason v. Owen, 578 F.2d 572, 574 (5th Cir. 1978). Nor does the dismissal fall within the limited class of interlocutory appeals authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(3) relating to the rights and liabilities of parties in admiralty. See Austracan (U.S.A.), Inc. v. M/V LEMONCORE, 500 F.2d 237, 240-41 (5th Cir. 1974).

Therefore, we dismiss Seahorse Boat & Barge Corporation's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal DISMISSED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Thomas v. Johnston
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • 21 Enero 1983
    ... ... 881 Diane Shisk, Renea Hicks, Advocacy Inc., Austin, Tex., for plaintiffs ... Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 261, 97 S.Ct. 555, 561, 50 ... ...
  • Arkansas Medical Soc., Inc. v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 10 Septiembre 1993
    ... ...         In Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct ... ...
  • Stewart v. Bernstein
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 3 Septiembre 1985
    ... ... Holding Co., Inc., d/b/a Kilgore Nursing Center, Steve Vaughn, and ... ...
  • Sambrano v. United Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 17 Febrero 2022
    ...jurisdiction is not properly before us on this interlocutory appeal. See Seahorse Boat & Barge Corp. v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 617 F.2d 396, 397 (5th Cir. 1980). We therefore do not consider Turnbough's claims. [5] Ironically, the dissenting opinion accuses us of omitting facts becau......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT