Seal v. Seal

Decision Date17 September 1980
PartiesElizabeth Relfe SEAL v. Kenneth Arthur SEAL. Civ. 2134.
CourtAlabama Court of Civil Appeals

J. Massey Relfe, Jr., of Relfe, Ramsey & Evans, Birmingham, for appellant.

Robert F. Clark, Mobile, for appellee.

BRADLEY, Judge.

This is a divorce case.

The wife, Elizabeth Relfe Seal, is a resident of Mobile County, Alabama. The husband, Kenneth Arthur Seal, is a resident of Falls Church, Virginia.

A complaint for divorce was filed by the husband in Mobile County, Alabama. The matter was set for hearing on January 25, 1979. At this time a settlement was reached between the parties and the agreement was presented to the court. The attorney for the wife was directed to prepare the divorce decree and submit it to the court within twenty days. The husband was to be given the opportunity to review the decree before it was submitted to the court. The case was ordered to be placed on the March trial disposition docket of the Mobile County Circuit Court.

Four days later on January 29, 1979 the husband filed a "Motion to Set Aside the Agreement and to Set Cause for Trial on Merits." On February 2, 1979 the wife filed an answer to the motion to set aside the agreement. She asked that the motion be denied on the ground that it failed to allege facts showing mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure or any other reason justifying relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure.

A hearing on the motions was held on February 14, 1979. On March 9, 1979 the court set aside the agreement entered into by the parties on January 25, 1979 and set the case for trial on the merits. Trial was held on September 19, 1979 and a final decree of divorce was entered on October 22, 1979. The appeal is from this decree.

The wife's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court committed reversible error in granting husband's "Motion to Set Aside the Agreement and to Set Cause for Trial on Merits." In support of her contention, she argues that the trial court should have denied the husband's motion on the basis of Rule 60(b)(6) or other appropriate ground.

The husband says that the trial court is not bound by agreements made by the parties before final judgment is entered. Also, he argues that Rule 60(b)(6) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure is not applicable to the "Motion to Set Aside the Agreement and Set Cause for Trial on Merits" because no final judgment was ever entered adopting and confirming the agreement. The husband says that he could simply ask the court for permission to withdraw the agreement, and the court without committing error could permit the withdrawal. We agree.

The law in Alabama dealing with agreements made between litigants prior to trial is clear. In the case of Williams v. Williams, 261 Ala. 328, 74 So.2d 582 (1954), our supreme court said:

The trial court, in making its decree, is not controlled by the agreement of the parties. He may adopt or reject such parts of it as seem proper from the situation of the parties as shown by the evidence on the trial.

Russell v. Russell, 247 Ala. 284, 24 So.2d 124 (1945); Baumler v. Baumler, Ala.Civ.App., 368 So.2d 864 (1979); Kohn v. Kohn, 52 Ala.App. 636, 296 So.2d 725 (1974).

In the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Stockton v. Stockton
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • May 27, 1982
    ...by the terms of a property settlement agreement. Wallace v. United States, (8th Cir. 1971) 439 F.2d 757 (Iowa law); Seal v. Seal, (1980) Ala.Civ.App., 390 So.2d 639, cert. denied 399 So.2d 845; Campanello v. Mason, Okl., 571 P.2d 449. However, it has also been said that while the court is n......
  • Jones v. Jones (Ex parte Jones)
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • April 30, 2021
    ...See R.E. Grills, Inc., 641 So. 2d at 229. See also Delchamps v. Delchamps, 449 So. 2d 1249 (Ala. Civ. App. 1984) ; and Seal v. Seal, 390 So. 2d 639 (Ala. Civ. App. 1980).The wife's request for an attorney fee in connection with the petition is denied.PETITION DENIED. Thompson, P.J., and Moo......
  • Ex parte Jones
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • April 30, 2021
    ...R.E. Grills, Inc., 641Page 14 So. 2d at 229. See also Delchamps v. Delchamps, 449 So. 2d 1249 (Ala. Civ. App. 1984); and Seal v. Seal, 390 So. 2d 639 (Ala. Civ. App. 1980). The wife's request for an attorney fee in connection with the petition is denied. PETITION DENIED. Thompson, P.J., and......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT