Sealand Terminals, Inc. v. Gasparic, No. 521
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 7 F.3d 321 |
| Parties | SEALAND TERMINALS, INC. and Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Mario GASPARIC and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. ocket 93-4103. |
| Docket Number | No. 521,D |
| Decision Date | 21 October 1993 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
55 practice notes
-
Parihuaman Carrasco v. Triple Canopy, Inc., 19-0485
...to draw a different conclusion from the same evidence, which is outside the Board's scope of review. Sealand Terminals, Inc. v. Gasparic, 7 F.3d 321, 28 BRBS 7(CRT) (2d Cir. 1993); John W. McGrath Corp. v. Hughes, 289 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1961) (administrative law judge is entitled to draw inf......
-
Harris v. U.S., 97 CIV.1904(CSH).
...for which the defendant is being sentenced, and it therefore does not result in double counting offense conduct toward sentencing. 7 F.3d at 321 (emphasis added). The Rosario court said that defendant's argument "ignores the difference between the use of force in committing a robbery, and f......
-
United States v. Bell, : 17-3792
...the commission of the offense in that the victim ‘could do nothing about [his] situation because of the physical restraint.’ " 7 F.3d at 321 (quoting United States v. Doubet , 969 F.2d 341, 347 (7th Cir. 1992) abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Dunnigan , 507 U.S. 87, 113 S.Ct. ......
-
U.S. v. Hickman, 97-40237
...the physical holding of the victim or the confining of the victim in some manner coupled with a threat of violence. See, e.g., Rosario, 7 F.3d at 321 (defendant stood on victim's throat); United States v. Foppe, 993 F.2d 1444, 1452-53 (9th Cir.1993)(defendant dragged and grabbed victims); K......
Request a trial to view additional results
53 cases
-
Parihuaman Carrasco v. Triple Canopy, Inc., 19-0485
...to draw a different conclusion from the same evidence, which is outside the Board's scope of review. Sealand Terminals, Inc. v. Gasparic, 7 F.3d 321, 28 BRBS 7(CRT) (2d Cir. 1993); John W. McGrath Corp. v. Hughes, 289 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1961) (administrative law judge is entitled to draw inf......
-
Harris v. U.S., No. 97 CIV.1904(CSH).
...for which the defendant is being sentenced, and it therefore does not result in double counting offense conduct toward sentencing. 7 F.3d at 321 (emphasis added). The Rosario court said that defendant's argument "ignores the difference between the use of force in committing a robbery, and f......
-
United States v. Bell, No: 17-3792
...the commission of the offense in that the victim ‘could do nothing about [his] situation because of the physical restraint.’ " 7 F.3d at 321 (quoting United States v. Doubet , 969 F.2d 341, 347 (7th Cir. 1992) abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Dunnigan , 507 U.S. 87, 113 S.Ct. ......
-
U.S. v. Hickman, No. 97-40237
...the physical holding of the victim or the confining of the victim in some manner coupled with a threat of violence. See, e.g., Rosario, 7 F.3d at 321 (defendant stood on victim's throat); United States v. Foppe, 993 F.2d 1444, 1452-53 (9th Cir.1993)(defendant dragged and grabbed victims); K......
Request a trial to view additional results