Seals v. City of Baton Rouge
| Decision Date | 25 March 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 4366,4366 |
| Citation | Seals v. City of Baton Rouge, 94 So.2d 478 (La. App. 1957) |
| Parties | Lucille M. SEALS v. The CITY OF BATON ROUGE. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana |
R. Gordon Kean, Jr., John V. Parker, Baton Rouge, for appellant.
L. C. Parker, H. D. Copenhaver, Jr., Baton Rouge, for appellee.
This matter is before us on an appeal taken by the City of Baton Rouge from a judgment rendered against it in the Court below.The trial judge rendered written reasons for judgment which we herewith set out in full:
'Without further review of Dr. Witter's testimony it suffices to say he testified positively and unequivocally that mental agitation and worry over the probability of his forced retirement was the sole cause of Captain Seals' fatal heart attack.His testimony on that point is not contradicted to the slightest extent, and there does not appear to be any dispute about the matter.
'Dr. Witter's qualifications as a medical expert, his integrity, and his professional standing and reputation are unquestioned.This Court accepts his testimony as conclusive.
'The facts relative to the probable forced retirement of Captain Seals are reflected by certain documents filed in evidence in connection with the joint stipulations of the parties.
'For the year 1954 the city budgeted $3,000 to the police department for 'Physical Capacities Analysis.'This work was under the direction of Dr. Charles McVea, and eminent physical and surgeon of Baton Rouge.Prior to October 15, 1954, physical examinations were made by Dr. McVea or under his direction of a large number, possibly all, of the members of the police department, including Captain Seals.The actual physical examination of Captain Seals was made by Dr. Louis Mayer, an associate of Dr. McVea's and likewise an eminent physician and surgeon.Based on Dr. Mayer's examination, Dr. McVea reported to Shirley S. Arrighi, Chief of Police, that This report with recommendations, along with reports and recommendation relative to various other members of the police department, was embodied in a letter of the Chief of Police to the mayor and city council under date of October 15, 1954.The chief called attention to the fact that Captain Seals had just completed twenty years of service and was eligible for retirement.He recommended that Captain Seals be given a disability pension.
'It is stipulated that Captain Seals was receiving a salary of $400 per month, and that his retirement benefits or disability pension, whichever it might be called, would be $200 per month.
'It is stipulated by the parties that if Chief Arrighi had been called as a witness he would have testified that he did not single Captain Seals out with demands for retirement.However, plaintiff declined to admit the correctness of such testimony.
'At a meeting of the City Council on December 29, 1954, the question of the admitted actuarial unsoundness of the police pension system was discussed and steps were outlines looking toward some remedy for this situation.The minutes of this meeting indicate that the members of the police department were aware of the unsoundness of their pension system, and since Captain Seals was one of the high ranking officers of the department, it is reasonable to assume he was aware of it.
'At the council meeting of December 29, 1954, a resolution was offered to provide funds to defray the additional cost of disability retirements recommended by the chief in his letter of October 15, 1954.This resolution was laid over for action on January 12, 1955.
'Under date of December, 30, 1954, the police civil service board forwarded a letter to Captain Seals which shows that he fell short of having twenty years service with the police department.
'At this state of the proceedings, under date of January 3, 1955, the Chief of Police forwarded to Captain Seals a letter reading as follows:
'On January 12, 1955, the city council adopted the resolution introduced on December 29, 1954, wherein it assured the trustees of the police pension fund that it would make available, as required, additional funds to defray the cost of the disability retirements in question.
'In my opinion this court is not called upon to determine whether the city authorities had the legal right to force Captain Seals to retire, nor to determine whether he was physically able to perform the duties of a police captain. Since the cause of his death has been established, it is necessary to determine whether this cause of his death was an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.
'From the evidence it readily appears that the one single occurrence which was the direct cause of decedent's fatal heart attack was his receipt of the letter addressed to him by the chief of police under date of January 3, 1955, which letter is quoted in full hereinabove.The other related occurrences formed the background for the letter, but it was the letter itself which carred the tone of finality.If we have an accident here in the contemplation of the statute it is decedent's receipt of this letter on or about January 3, 1955, and not his heart attack of January 21, 1955.The heart attack was the fatal result of the alleged accident.SeeKraemer v. Jahncke Services, La.App., Orleans, 83 So.2d 916.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Rogers v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
...La.App. 4 Cir., 137 So.2d 486; Lirette v. Boh Brothers Construction Co., Inc., La.App. 1 Cir., 161 So.2d 405; Seals v. City of Baton Rouge, La.App. 1 Cir., 94 So.2d 478; LeCompte v. Kay et al., La.App. 1 Cir., 156 So.2d 75; and Blake v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York et al., La.App......
-
Powell v. Gold Crown Stamp Co.
...with citations of Moss v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, La.App., 35 So.2d 867 (1st Cir. 1948), Seals v. City of Baton Rouge, La.App., 94 So.2d 478 (1st Cir. 1957, cert. denied), Mabry v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, La.App., 155 So.2d 44 (2nd Cir. 1963, cert. denied), LeCo......
-
Jenkinson v. Clemons
...Courts and as stated in the case of Prejean v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation, La.App., 125 So.2d 221. See also Seals v. City of Baton Rouge, La.App., 94 So.2d 478; Hastings v. Homewood Development Company, La.App., 84 So.2d 883; Keene v. Carraway & McDougald, La.App., 95 So.2d 849. In vie......
-
City of Austin v. Johnson
...considered in at least three other jurisdictions. In all three, it was decided not to be a compensable injury. Seals v. City of Baton Rouge, 94 So.2d 478 (La.Ct.App. 1 Cir. 1957); Chapman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 221 Tenn. 376, 426 S.W.2d 760 (1968); In Re Korsun's Case, 354 Mass. 12......