Securities and Exchange Commission v. Todd, et al.

Docket Number07-56098,07-56193,07-56196
Decision Date23 June 2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
197 cases
  • In re Galena Biopharma, Inc. Sec. Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Oregon
    • 5 August 2015
    ...mix’ of information made available.' " Petrie v. Elec. Game Card, Inc., 761 F.3d 959, 970 (9th Cir.2014) (quoting S.E.C. v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1215 (9th Cir.2011) ). "[A] statement is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in m......
  • SFF-Tir, LLC v. Stephenson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Oklahoma
    • 25 April 2017
    ...In re GlenFed, Inc. Sec. Litig., 42 F.3d 1541, 1548–49 (9th Cir. 1994) (en banc), superseded by statute as recognized in SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1216 (9th Cir. 2011) ). A statement of fact is material if " 'a reasonable person would consider it important in determining whether to buy or......
  • Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Goldstone
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • 8 July 2013
    ...has not reached the issue. The Ninth Circuit holds that, “[t]o be liable, one must ‘knowingly’ make false statements.” SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1219 (9th Cir.2011)(quoting United States v. Goyal, 629 F.3d 912, 916 n. 6 (9th Cir.2010)). See United States v. Goyal, 629 F.3d at 916 n. 6 (“[......
  • In re Trilegiant Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • 28 March 2014
    ...the statement or omission complained of was false or misleading.”), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1216 (9th Cir.2011).To satisfy the particularity requirement of Rule 9(b), the Plaintiffs claim that they only need to detail the general conto......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
7 books & journal articles
  • FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 58-3, July 2021
    • 1 July 2021
    ...Rule 13 only applies to material statements.70 “insignif‌icant or technical infractions or inadvertent conduct”); see also SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1219 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing Congress’s intent to not impose liability for accidental errors). 62. “A willfully blind defendant is one w......
  • Foreign corrupt practices act
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 60-3, July 2023
    • 1 July 2023
    ...the purpose of accounting controls, not for “insignif‌icant or technical infractions or inadvertent conduct”); see also SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1219 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing Congress’s intent to not impose liability for accidental errors). 64. See, e.g. , Global -Tech Appliances, Inc......
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 59-3, July 2022
    • 1 July 2022
    ...13b2-2 only applies to material statements. 69 “insignificant or technical infractions or inadvertent conduct”); see also SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1219 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing Congress’s intent to not impose liability for accidental errors). 61. “A willfully blind defendant is one wh......
  • Foreign corrupt practices act
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 62-3, July 2025
    • 1 July 2025
    ...the purpose of accounting controls, not for “insignificant or technical infractions or inadvertent conduct”); see also SEC v. Todd, 642 F.3d 1207, 1219 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing Congress’s intent to not impose liability for accidental 64. See, e.g., Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A......
  • Get Started for Free